Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Huddle Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Wes21 Mentor

Wes21

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Best guess is like the media typically does, they are reporting it not because the risk is high, but because lots of people will read it with the current situation. Having the potential to become a pandemic does not mean likely to become a pandemic would be my guess, giving the media's track record.

They also like to "get it on record" early, so if it becomes something they can pull up their old reporting to say they were on top of it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DeAngelo Beason Mentor

DeAngelo Beason

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

There is a huge misunderstanding in this thread, on redit, on twitter, etc. that there IS a mass hysteria. There is not. Maybe 1% of people are scared and are locking themselves away. This misunderstanding seems to be the rallying cry for people that argue against the seriousness of this pandemic. As I've said many times in this thread, the far vast majority of people that take COVID seriously are doing so TO PROTECT OTHERS. Not themselves. So there is no need for you to downplay the symptoms as almost everyone knows it's not going to send you to the ER. But by wearing our masks (like you smartly did to see your mom), and social distancing, we can hopefully get things back to normal one day. Sadly, people still don't wear masks. And the multitude of cases are rising all over. And that last line ... wow. You want the young to GET INFECTED. These same ones that might not be as smart as you when visiting their own mom. Herd immunity will not work.

I mentioned in a separate comment that my statement had nothing to do with masks.  Not sure how that was gleaned from what I said.  Regardless, I agree with wearing masks.  I disagree with your assessment that there is not mass hysteria.  It still absolutely dominates the headlines and dominates every single form of social media.  It's absolutely dominating the entirety of American life in general, as a matter of fact.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, stirs said:

https://www.chron.com/lifestyle/article/A-hypervigilant-mom-followed-every-health-15373512.php

Dynamics of an airborne disease and some people do not quite grasp that.  If you breathe, which is to say not being dead, you can get this no matter what you do.  It doesn't just linger in the air of grocery stores, churches, restaurants or bars.  Short of living in an astronaut suit with your own oxygen supply, you have a decent chance of getting this.  I think that's where the mentality is different.   People like the lady in the article thought there would be no way she could get this if she did x,y,z.  When dealing with microscopic particles in the air, you are at risk...period.  You can don PPE all day long and it will reduce the risk, but there is still a risk, none-the-less.  That is the reason analysts keep saying such a high number of people will have or had this by year's end.  Two things will happen: either we will reach effective (not total) heard immunity to the point the viral impact dwindles naturally or we get a vaccine before then.  At this point, it looks like the first scenario may occur.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Dynamics of an airborne disease and some people do not quite grasp that.  If you breathe, which is to say not being dead, you can get this no matter what you do.  It doesn't just linger in the air of grocery stores, churches, restaurants or bars.  Short of living in an astronaut suit with your own oxygen supply, you have a decent chance of getting this.  I think that's where the mentality is different.   People like the lady in the article thought there would be no way she could get this if she did x,y,z.  When dealing with microscopic particles in the air, you are at risk...period.  You can don PPE all day long and it will reduce the risk, but there is still a risk, none-the-less.  That is the reason analysts keep saying such a high number of people will have or had this by year's end.  Two things will happen: either we will reach effective (not total) heard immunity to the point the viral impact dwindles naturally or we get a vaccine before then.  At this point, it looks like the first scenario may occur.

I have worn Delta suits, bubble suits, PAPR's......it ain't that bad 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jfra78 Grand Master

jfra78

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

Dynamics of an airborne disease and some people do not quite grasp that.  If you breathe, which is to say not being dead, you can get this no matter what you do.  It doesn't just linger in the air of grocery stores, churches, restaurants or bars.  Short of living in an astronaut suit with your own oxygen supply, you have a decent chance of getting this.  I think that's where the mentality is different.   People like the lady in the article thought there would be no way she could get this if she did x,y,z.  When dealing with microscopic particles in the air, you are at risk...period.  You can don PPE all day long and it will reduce the risk, but there is still a risk, none-the-less.  That is the reason analysts keep saying such a high number of people will have or had this by year's end.  Two things will happen: either we will reach effective (not total) heard immunity to the point the viral impact dwindles naturally or we get a vaccine before then.  At this point, it looks like the first scenario may occur.

No you can't be completely safe, that is obvious.  It's about reducing the risks.  It's a very simple concept, easy to follow and really not a big deal to put on a mask for 30 mins to an hour while you're shopping.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ja Rhule Grand Master

Ja Rhule

Posted
  • Author
Posted
24 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

There will be no college FB or NFL this season. If you can get a refund for PSLs you should jump on it. 

I think they will have both just without fans like in Europe.  European soccer restarted a month ago and has been pretty successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

I think they will have both just without fans like in Europe.  European soccer restarted a month ago and has been pretty successful.

Look at their current case counts versus ours though. Our athletes have a much higher chance of exposure and infection simply because there's a lot more virus in circulation here than there.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

I think they will have both just without fans like in Europe.  European soccer restarted a month ago and has been pretty successful.

Good point but like LV just said look at the virus climate here compared to Europe. USA has been handling this terribly and we are like 100+ days into this pandemic and it’s not being contained. 
 

NFL has a better chance than college because You can isolate the pros. In college, these guys are going to have to manage coursework, studying, working out, being in a bubble with an entire university as well as the common challenges of being a college kid like partying, girls, alcohol,!etc. I just don’t see college FB happening. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ja Rhule Grand Master

Ja Rhule

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Good point but like LV just said look at the virus climate here compared to Europe. USA has been handling this terribly and we are like 100+ days into this pandemic and it’s not being contained. 
 

NFL has a better chance than college because You can isolate the pros. In college, these guys are going to have to manage coursework, studying, working out, being in a bubble with an entire university as well as the common challenges of being a college kid like partying, girls, alcohol,!etc. I just don’t see college FB happening. 

Will be interesting to see.  It would be so much lost revenue it’s almost hard to believe.  So Europe really had no second wave and they just begun to reopen.  I wonder if US will jump ahead of Europe with the second wave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Happy Panther said:

What is interesting is a few states may be recovered enough to start having fans this fall while it looks like others don't have a chance. Giants and Jets maybe. Cardinals hell no.

We're way too interconnected with interstate commerce. That's why we need widespread efforts. Local efforts aren't enough. The vast majority of the cases genetically trace to the original NYC outbreak. Unfortunately, the virus doesn't understand or respect man-made barriers like state lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • csx
      Benjamin Solak on Panthers draft needs

      By csx · Posted

      OL then RB would make heads explode but its might not be too unlikely 
    • strato
      Benjamin Solak on Panthers draft needs

      By strato · Posted

      Wonder if we draft a RB. Seems like a lot of eggs in Brooks’ basket right now.  And the OL, no kidding. If that running game goes to hell with what we have at QB, you can forget competing. It is so much more important than sticking another wideout on the field. Take your wideout later. 
    • strato
      2026 Win predictions from DraftKings

      By strato · Posted

      I have lots of different thoughts on it. This argument, the primary thing is I don’t like seeing him or anyone, being convicted on hearsay and/or pure speculation. Which some are doing.  I don’t care That much about defending Morgan as I do about the criticism being fair minded.    You sort of assert that Dan was just a yes man. I don’t think we know if he ever pushed back against Fitterer but I have this instinct thing that needs me to satisfy the question of: if Tepper was so down on a Fitterer as to fire him, why in the world would he hire his carbon copy? I guess maybe he wanted a yes man.Like I said, lots of different thoughts.     I am just not gonna judge him that harshly based only on speculation. I am sticking with what he has done starting when he was hired as GM. Maybe I am more lenient because the first season for him and Canales, I gave both a pass. Said I would judge them after the first year. Stuck to it. If you can get to the reality that neither were ready for the job and say okay give them a year get their feet wet, it looks a lot better.    And we are not bound to Bryce yet. Yes, for yet another fuging year he can probably marginally improve and slide by like he has been doing. But if they add even more people and he regresses? I think we could see some relief.    The QB room? As I understand it, Pickett was Canales’ choice. If we need to blame people for poo. In a sense, he is very Bryce like. So makes a good plug in. I get that a little bit. We still have the draft. If they do better than Jake Plummer or Hooker I’ll know they are trying.   
×
×
  • Create New...