Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers sign former Cardinals NT


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, cmichd said:

They will take the old farts who are washed up instead of drafting young tackles.  If they draft a LT with the number 7 pick....They will have to rush me to the hospital....I will drop out with a heart attack

 

Again they just drafted 2 LT last year.. They weren't throwing them away after 1 season.. Just because some fans think they suck and have no future...

Ppl need to understand this..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Again they just drafted 2 LT last year.. They weren't throwing them away after 1 season.. Just because some fans think they suck and have no future...

Ppl need to understand this..

Well we drafted a S that got discarded after a little over one season and we might be discarding a QB after one season. 

I will say that has been a welcome change, seeing them cut their losses quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Again they just drafted 2 LT last year.. They weren't throwing them away after 1 season.. Just because some fans think they suck and have no future...

Ppl need to understand this..

Not the caliber of Willis, Thomas, and Becton.....we should be able to get one of the 3

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we fully committing to a 43 or 34 defense or doing a hybrid/mix of both? I like this pickup as depth for our line, albeit, knowing nothing about this player. Considering the fact that we have massive holes all along the line I like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Well we drafted a S that got discarded after a little over one season and we might be discarding a QB after one season. 

I will say that has been a welcome change, seeing them cut their losses quickly.

Safety got 2 off-season and had some off and on the field issues.. If the 2 LT get the same treatment.. You would have a point...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cmichd said:

Not the caliber of Willis, Thomas, and Becton.....we should be able to get one of the 3

 

They also don't have CB, DT, or MLB of the caliber of players.. Nor do they have the bodies to play those position... 

But they drafted these kids and will give them more then one season to develop.. And now theyare have a stopgap to teach them as well. 

Again WE have 5 OT on the roster and 3 of them are very young.. We have 2 DT now and 1 cb with playing experience.. WHATS THE bigger need here?

They are better set up at OT then they are at DT, CB, and LB...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Safety got 2 off-season and had some off and on the field issues.. If the 2 LT get the same treatment.. You would have a point...

I don't think they will get cut. We need bodies if nothing else. It isn't like we are deep on the OL. 

But, my point was that I am not sure anything would really surprise me this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

I don't think they will get cut. We need bodies if nothing else. It isn't like we are deep on the OL. 

But, my point was that I am not sure anything would really surprise me this offseason.

Okay .. that's not a bad point.. My opinion is based on logic of moves at this point.. I can't factor them being retarded but that is a possibility..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You might want to re-read that. They're specifically saying they DON'T use stats. They arbitrarily judge each play and then extrapolate that into a grade.
    • You're correct (on its face). But PFF does indeed use advanced stats to come up with their grades. Not trying to turn this into a debate about PFF (at all because it's been done ad nauseum), but here is how PFF explains it:   GRADES VS. STATS We aren’t grading players based on the yardage they rack up or the stats they collect. Statistics can be indicative of performance but don’t tell the whole story and can often lie badly. Quarterbacks can throw the ball straight to defenders but if the ball is dropped, you won't see it on the stat sheet. Conversely, they can dump the ball off on a sequence of screen passes and end up with a gaudy looking stat line if those skill position players do enough work after the catch. PFF grades the play, not its result, so the quarterback that throws the ball to defenders will be downgraded whether the defender catches the ball to notch the interception on the stat sheet or not. No amount of broken tackles and yards after the catch from a bubble screen will earn a quarterback a better grade, even though his passing stats may be getting padded. The same is true for most positions. Statistics can be misleading. A tackle whose quarterback gets the ball out of his hands quicker than anybody else may not give up many sacks, but he can still be beaten often and earn a poor grade. Receivers that are targeted relentlessly could post big-time numbers but may offer little more than the product of a volume-based aerial attack. https://www.pff.com/grades So PFF uses stats to come up with player grades and rankings.  
×
×
  • Create New...