Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What players would have to still be on the board for you to not want a trade down


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

Sorry if this was already discussed, didn’t see anything. 
 

So which players still available at 7(assuming we don’t trade up) would make a trade down out of the question. For me it’s only four guys;

1) Chase Young

2) Isaiah Simmons

3) Jeffery Okudah 

4) Joe Burrow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of the potentials, IMO Brown, Wills, Wirfs, Okudah, and Simmons are all worthy of the #7 overall pick. There's no chance they'll all be gone. Now with that said, you have 10 minutes on the clock. If you're getting calls there's no reason not to listen. You never know when Marty Hurney might call you with a reckless offer. Oh wait...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm torn. If Hurney wasn't here I would say trade down and get more players in this draft. With him still here, I remain skeptical. Added to the fact that we have so little valuable NFL experience involved this offseason, I just hope they keep it simple and take good football players that can contribute and get playing time this year in the first 3 rounds. If we trade up then we will be set back another year, just like last year.

I don't really care about the talent drop off trading back from the 7th pick this year. We have a lot of needs and will be picking in the top 10 next year at the least, very possibly the year after also. There just is not anybody involved with the process that I know makes great NFL decisions and nothing so far this offseason has changed that yet.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to say without knowing specifics of the offer

Burrow, Tua (if confident about medical), Young, Okuda, and Simmons I have a bit ahead of everyone else.

What if the question was more specific,  

If Raiders offered picks 12 and 19 for our 7 and 38, what players would have to be on the board for you not to take it?

In that situation, maybe Burrow, Tua, Young and Okuda and I might change my mind on Okuda depending on how much I like the next few CBs on my board.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are not trading down. 
 

geez, we haven’t had a real LT since Jordan Gross and now we have a chance to get one,..

DT, CB, and a LB/Safety,..

If they ALL were still there,.. like if the first 6 picks were all QB ha,... then you could afford to trade back and take whichever is left.

thats ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not that big a fan of trading down in this draft.

There are plenty of good players expected to be available at number seven.

Is that you Hurney? :)

Actually a lot of GMs fall into that thinking, but history probably tells us otherwise.  

Is you chance of helping your team with pick 7, really that much better than 12 and 60?

Picking the best player and adding the most talent to your team is two different things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...