Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jaguars looking to trade Fournette


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MMA said:

We ain’t getting Trevor. Tepper is too stupid to rebuild this team. He’s the Michael Jordan owner in the NFL. The man signed a coach from college for 7 yr 62 mil. He cut Cam Newton who was going to make 19 mil. Instead of trying to limit the signings in free agency, we go spending. Lose a lot of comp picks. That’s not how you rebuild a team. And did I forget to mention that Tepper kept the biggest problem (Marty Hurney) and fired everyone else. 

none of this is wrong

LJqb.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MMA said:

We ain’t getting Trevor. Tepper is too stupid to rebuild this team. He’s the Michael Jordan owner in the NFL. The man signed a coach from college for 7 yr 62 mil. He cut Cam Newton who was going to make 19 mil. Instead of trying to limit the signings in free agency, we go spending. Lose a lot of comp picks. That’s not how you rebuild a team. And did I forget to mention that Tepper kept the biggest problem (Marty Hurney) and fired everyone else. 

What kind of progression would you need to see over a 3-to-5 year time frame in order to admit you were wrong about Tepper?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, t96 said:

Count me in as one of the idiots who wanted him badly over McCaffrey...

That's not really an idiot opinion at the time.  Fournette can be all world when he wants to be.  But he's a lot like Clowney and "plays when he wants to play."  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, t96 said:

Well Kamara and Cook are in a contract year, McC actually had 2 years left. But I don’t think the deal was dumb and I’m sure another RB will get more than him in the next year or 2

Both will demand more money than CMC simply because CMC got paid first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Snake said:

Both will demand more money than CMC simply because CMC got paid first. 

Probably but who knows with RB contracts. McC is honestly way better than both of them, and most people can see that (Cook unreliable and Kamara better in a split time role). If Vikings and Aints look at what happened with the Rams and Gurley I could see them hesitating. Open market hasn’t been kind to RBs either (Bell and Gordon)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, MMA said:

We ain’t getting Trevor. Tepper is too stupid to rebuild this team. He’s the Michael Jordan owner in the NFL. The man signed a coach from college for 7 yr 62 mil. He cut Cam Newton who was going to make 19 mil. Instead of trying to limit the signings in free agency, we go spending. Lose a lot of comp picks. That’s not how you rebuild a team. And did I forget to mention that Tepper kept the biggest problem (Marty Hurney) and fired everyone else. 

Thats cute you are still mad about Cam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me there's a trend in the NFL where the tolerance level  for "distraction" type players is dropping, and fast.

Teams are moving on more quickly and those players are having a harder time finding teams to re-engage with them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You might want to re-read that. They're specifically saying they DON'T use stats. They arbitrarily judge each play and then extrapolate that into a grade.
    • You're correct (on its face). But PFF does indeed use advanced stats to come up with their grades. Not trying to turn this into a debate about PFF (at all because it's been done ad nauseum), but here is how PFF explains it:   GRADES VS. STATS We aren’t grading players based on the yardage they rack up or the stats they collect. Statistics can be indicative of performance but don’t tell the whole story and can often lie badly. Quarterbacks can throw the ball straight to defenders but if the ball is dropped, you won't see it on the stat sheet. Conversely, they can dump the ball off on a sequence of screen passes and end up with a gaudy looking stat line if those skill position players do enough work after the catch. PFF grades the play, not its result, so the quarterback that throws the ball to defenders will be downgraded whether the defender catches the ball to notch the interception on the stat sheet or not. No amount of broken tackles and yards after the catch from a bubble screen will earn a quarterback a better grade, even though his passing stats may be getting padded. The same is true for most positions. Statistics can be misleading. A tackle whose quarterback gets the ball out of his hands quicker than anybody else may not give up many sacks, but he can still be beaten often and earn a poor grade. Receivers that are targeted relentlessly could post big-time numbers but may offer little more than the product of a volume-based aerial attack. https://www.pff.com/grades So PFF uses stats to come up with player grades and rankings.  
×
×
  • Create New...