Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chinn vs. Simmons: A comparison of the measureables


MHS831

Recommended Posts

 

Simmons

Chinn

height

6’ 4”

6” 3”

weight

233

221

Hand

9 5/8

9 5/8

Arm

33 3/8

32 1/8

40

4.39

4.45

vertical

39

41

Broad jump

132 in.

138 in.

Bench

----

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comparing the 8th overall pick with the 64th overall pick is hardly fair, but it was leaked that the Panthers were not crazy about Simmon’s lack of physicality.  He makes tackles, but he does not punish the ball carrier.  Chinn has more of a reputation for being physical.

Since it was known that we were considering Blacklock and YGM in the second, can we assume that we would have taken the bigger need, DT, instead of YGM?  I think that might have been the factor that tipped the scales.

So instead of Brown, YGM  we would have been Simmons, Blacklock.

But the addition of Chinn is almost as if we got the best of both worlds---that Swiss army knife (Buffalo nickel, S that hits harder than the ninth overall pick) the best DT in the draft, and the third rated DE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chinn LOVES to hit while Simmons... not so much.

Go watch Chinn’s 1v1’s at the senior bowl. He looked very comfortable. Didn’t win all of his reps but Chinn showed he has the skills and athleticism to be able to cover some of the better prospects 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big difference that we saw between the two is the love of hitting and contact.

Jonathan Jones made it sound like we were concerned about Simmons' willingness and desire to hit.

Chinn looks like he is on a mission out there to seek and destroy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Daddy_Uncle said:

Yeah I'm excited for our young defense to get on the field and grow together. May not be great year 1 but they will steadily become a pretty damn good unit I believe. Still need help with dline depth, and secondary but it's a multi year process

Our draft has been a GREAT step in the right direction. A solid building block

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes you take an Athlete and hope you can mold him. Chinn is the prototype Buffalo Nickel. Needs to work on his coverage skills a bit more but can Blitz and play from the Slot with the speed to cover.

 

Love the pick the more I think about it. He may be a poor mans Simmons but that's perfectly fine 

Wish he coulda had a chance to play with Luke tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the biggest things is that Clemson didn't really use Simmons as a LB, he was all over the place. Chinn was being used as a DB.

I think that is actually advantage Chinn. Simmons will have bigger learning curve. Chinn will have more problems adjusting to the speed. IMO, anyway 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

But the addition of Chinn is almost as if we got the best of both worlds---that Swiss army knife (Buffalo nickel, S that hits harder than the ninth overall pick) the best DT in the draft, and the third rated DE.

Brown/YGM/Chinn >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Simmons/Blacklock/(fill in the blank with a second-rate CB)

Easily and by far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Rags said:

Sometimes you take an Athlete and hope you can mold him. Chinn is the prototype Buffalo Nickel. Needs to work on his coverage skills a bit more but can Blitz and play from the Slot with the speed to cover.

 

Love the pick the more I think about it. He may be a poor mans Simmons but that's perfectly fine 

Wish he coulda had a chance to play with Luke tho.

I wanted to call him just that, but in this system, he may be a better fit than Simmons would have been.  I watched some video of Simmons and he had some moments--he can cover ground--but where does he fit?  Is he soft?  I even posted back in February--I just am not that impressed with him---what am I not seeing?  Maybe my expectations were too high; maybe I was drinking the Kool Aid.

I am totally happy with the way this turned out.  Silly school girl in a manly way kind of happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you so much for posting links to the players so I don’t have to copy and paste the name and look it up.
    • All signs point to legit. We’ve been way better than our record the last few years it’s just we’ve had brutal injury luck. Also I’ve watched nearly every game this year and 3 things have stood out to me even when healthy from early in the year to now: 1. Early on Lee had some brutal rotations and situational coaching but he’s improved a ton there. We lost some close ones early we should’ve won. Sure most our recent games have been blowouts but in close games we’ve improved a ton there. 2. Defense. Overall team defense has improved so much, it’s not just hot shooting winning games. This D is absolutely a real trend and sustainable. LaMelo in particular has gone from flat out bad defensively to above average. We have so much length we always should’ve been good defensively but it took time for guys to buy in and really hone in on it which they have.   3. Pretty much all our young guys have taken strides forward. Moose’s development as a passer has been insane, Miller is putting it all together to be an elite 3 tier scorer able to hit 3s, mid range and finish at the rim. LaMelo still some poor shot selection but has cut the turnovers considerably. Kon has been a great shooter all year but has steadily improved in other aspects of the game too.      It has definitely been surprising how quickly it all came together out of nowhere but really none of it surprises me. We’ve been building towards this for years now.
×
×
  • Create New...