Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pretty stark contrast here.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, bababoey said:

If you watch the secondary, Tre Boston was in single high with Burris down in the box covering the TE in man.  Why does he jump to cover the underneath route and not help the rookie who is all alone man v. man?  

It has been my observation for a while now that Boston will always choose whatever requires less effort and/or contact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happened to all those folks who thought the D Line was going to be a monster, and who just knew in their hearts that KK would have a bounce back year?

When do folks learn?

Big men, over 30, coming off injury....you typically can't count on them to do much...and you certainly can't overpay for them.

We are doing both, like normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NAS said:

We kept the  wrong guy.  Star is balling out in Bufallo

No, we didn't.  Star is very good, KK was very good.

Problem is, our GM doesn't know when to cut bait, and certainly doesn't understand just how F'ing stupid these restructures are.  On top of that, instead of drafting replacements and grooming them, we just keep the overpaid lazy guy on the roster because we need a Grier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched the condensed game 3 or 4 times while waiting for the All-22 and am excited to see if it confirms some of my current thoughts.

The primary ones being that Stephen Weatherly was our best DL while Marquis Haynes was our worst. Everybody made mistakes, but everybody with the exception of Zach Kerr flashed plays (Kerr wasn't bad like Haynes, but he wasn't good either). Roy was surprising, Brown was impressive, Short was a LOT better than I initially thought, and Obada played incredibly well with his limited snaps.

Burns is awesome, but two of the Raiders runs that set them up for short yardage conversions were because he ran up field and didn't contain. Yetur was damn near invisible as well, but he was constantly hustling which you like to see. I loved seeing him and Brown always being in the pile if Jacobs happened to scamper several yards downfield from the line of scrimmage.

Troy Pride Jr needs a year to learn. The Ruggs completion to set up their first Jacobs TD was because Troy followed the WR in man rather than setting back in cover 3 like the call looked to be (from what I could tell). Shaq had a play or two where he was caught out of position as well, but he was able to make up for it with his closing speed.

Speaking of motors, Juston Burris brings it on every play even if he's nowhere near it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KK did get blown up 5 yards back on one snap, but that man was also consistently the first lineman off of the ball and drew multiple double teams while also getting good pressure as an end when we showed 3-4 looks

This was the most noticeable Haynes was all game.

Haynes_Pancaked.thumb.PNG.e5698fa3db9a705a88e369b860bc16d6.PNG

Can we talk about how sexy Burns/Chinn as the OLBs in 3-4 sets is? Touch my body moar pls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kinda hard to understand why we kept KK at this point. Unless they were desperate for some continuity. I just have to imagine that even if he does have something left in the tank that it has to be hard to be motivated with all the turnover he's witnessed along the highs and lows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, bababoey said:

If you watch the secondary, Tre Boston was in single high with Burris down in the box covering the TE in man.  Why does he jump to cover the underneath route and not help the rookie who is all alone man v. man?  

Was he in single high or was he tasked with playing a "robber" role? Honestly we don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

It has been my observation for a while now that Boston will always choose whatever requires less effort and/or contact. 

** deleted because this was inadvertently/potentially viewed as racist. I do apologize for any insensitivities, it certainly was not my intention to do so. **

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • FLA showed everyone it’s not about superstars. they bullied the best line in the NHL into obscurity. they played hard, were in the right positions, and ran over everything that got in their way.
    • That’s really not what you said and when I even expressed doubt as to your intentions with the post you doubled down and remained unclear on whether you were trying to drag Dean Smith for whatever reason. You just got the facts wrong, which if you don’t follow the local college programs like you say then maybe you just were mistaken and thought Smith didn’t win championships or have legit superstars, and that is ok, but you just doubled down when my first post was more corrective than anything. I’m not sure what you expect posting objectively false things like “RBA has a lot of wins with nothing to show for it like Dean Smith” (paraphrasing) on a message board with plenty of UNC fans. I’m not taking it as a personal affront, we can agree to disagree, Dean Smith’s legacy fortunately will not be affected by this conversation. Screw the (Florida) Panthers?
    • Bring in the free agents and trades.  Florida is the best team and unless Tulsky makes it happen, it’s more of the same…which isn’t bad…but it’s time to win a goddamn cup. 
×
×
  • Create New...