Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

After two games, these teams are very, very close.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Carolina Panthers at Los Angeles Chargers. Take a look at the statistical matchup here after two games. 

 

Category Panthers Chargers
Offense    
Total Yards/Game 407.5 (9th) 420.5 (7th)
Rushing Yards/Game 108.0 (19th) 169.0 (6th)
Net Passing Yards/Game 299.5 (4th) 251.5 (12th)
Sacks Allowed 6 (t-23rd) 4 (t-13th)
Third Down Efficiency 54.2 (5th) 41.4 (18th)
Points/Game 23.5 (19th) 18.0 (t-27th)
Defense    
Total Yards/Game 355.5 (15th) 354.5 (14th)
Rushing Yards/Game 127.5 (19th) 123.5 (18th)
Passing Yards/Game 228.0 (10th) 231.0 (12th)
Sacks 0 (32nd) 4 (t-16th)
Third Down Efficiency 50.0 (t-23rd) 44.8 (18th)
Points/Game 32.5 (27th) 18.0 (3rd)

 

 

Both teams look very close except when it comes to points allowed per game. Huge difference there and likely the difference in the game on Sunday. 

The Panthers MUST figure out how to pressure a rookie QB and not make him look like a pro bowler. (as we have done in years past)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turnovers.  Chargers are +1 we are -2.  After 2 games that may be the biggest difference in these 2 teams.  We win that and put pressure on a rookie QB we win this game.

Another intresting state is Chargers and there great defense are giving up more ypc than us.  Almost 5 ypc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So we cut him if we don't give him the option?  I'm pretty sure there are players who didn't get the 5th-year option that played year four of their rookie contracts with their draft team.
    • I didn't say do nothing if we don't draft one in the 1st and I"m not counting on a FA to magically become a franchise QB. But signing a FA to be our starter for the year and then re-address the next offseason would be FAR better than reaching on the wrong QB in the 1st this offseason. Feeling we HAVE to find our long term solution just because we need a new QB is how we got into this mess.  We thought Two Gloves would be at worst an average level QB for a few years, that didn't happen, so we went out and traded for Darnold.  That didn't work so we went out and traded for Baker, that didn't work so we went out and traded up to get Bryce. Our last 4 QB moves were all trying to force a solution, none of them worked out, and we're still trying to find Cam's replacement all these years later.  We'd just have been better off spending a year or two building up the rest of the team and going year to year on FA QB's while doing so.  I get it, it will be frustrating to deal with, but then when you find that actual long term solution, they plug right into an already built out roster and you're ready to contend immediately.
    • Great win, should be 3-0 but I'll take 2-1. LaMelo is an MVP caliber player, period.   This is looking like an incredible draft so far. Sion James looking like the exact type of role player that all contending teams need to have, absolute steal in the 2nd. Kalk is a work in progress and I question how much upside he has but he's already been a considerable upgrade at C for us compared to the last several years (outside of healthy Mark which of course was rare).   Really seems like new ownership/front office has change the culture here significantly. Every guy looks bought in now.
×
×
  • Create New...