Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

When CMC comes back


NAS

Recommended Posts

What should this offense look like?

I hope he splits carries with Mike Davis 60/40 and gets more touches in the passing game with underneath throws. Maybe even line up with more split back sets. 

I think it’s a real positive that Davis has shown he can make an impact and can help minimize the wear and tear on CMC.  This would ensure he can make plays with fresh legs throughout the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually don't think we change much, except give Davis and Bonnefon a few more touches/snaps. Our offense has clicked a little bit better the past 2 games but I don't think it has anything to do with McC. The OL is clicking and Brady is getting more comfortable with calling plays against NFL defenses. Reason for these 2 wins has been improvement on D. I don't think the O has actually been much better these last 2 games than the first 2 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem we've had in the past was that nobody not named McCaffrey gave opposing DCs any reason to be hugely concerned.

I still wouldn't say we're to the point where any other players are striking fear on the other side, but it would be nice if we could get there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd actually be interested in seeing if Brady calls some plays with 2 RBs on the field and takes advantage of CMC as a route runner. Davis seems big enough to block should the defense have a light box and CMC is a better receiver than Samuel. It could be a good addition to the offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, t96 said:

I actually don't think we change much, except give Davis and Bonnefon a few more touches/snaps. Our offense has clicked a little bit better the past 2 games but I don't think it has anything to do with McC. The OL is clicking and Brady is getting more comfortable with calling plays against NFL defenses. Reason for these 2 wins has been improvement on D. I don't think the O has actually been much better these last 2 games than the first 2 games.

I disagree. We’re able to milk the clock by running the ball effectively and putting together demoralizing drives that take 10 - 15 plays. Davis was a huge part of that yesterday and would hate to see him have a significantly diminished role when he returns 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there has to be a balance.

CMC is a phenomenal talent.  It doesn't have to ride on his shoulders.  If CMC is feeling it and popping off big gains on a defense, you don't take him out to spread the touches, but if you need to change things up, Davis is there.  Reggie is a great compliment to CMC as well.

CMC is still the man in our offense, but if we can keep setting up 10+ play drives a game, there's more than enough touches to go around.  We just have to keep being efficient on 3rd down!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The problem we've had in the past was that nobody not named McCaffrey gave opposing DCs any reason to be hugely concerned.

I still wouldn't say we're to the point where any other players are striking fear on the other side, but it would be nice if we could get there.

Then the others should get good matchups

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, NAS said:

What should this offense look like?

I hope he splits carries with Mike Davis 60/40 and gets more touches in the passing game with underneath throws. Maybe even line up with more split back sets. 

I think it’s a real positive that Davis has shown he can make an impact and can help minimize the wear and tear on CMC.  This would ensure he can make plays with fresh legs throughout the season.

I'm for a steady rotation of all 3....Mike & Reggie have proven they can run, add in CMC and then ratchet the pace up to a LMU/Kimble/Gathers level and run the other team off the field week-in, week-out!

My sense is Brady is going to find playing time for a whole bunch of guys...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll say this.

I like what I've seen out of Davis AND Bonnafon.

Reggie looks a lot more like CMC than Davis does. But Davis is a grinder that wears out the line to make room for guys like CMC and Reggie.

I'd love to keep all three in the rotation.

TB100%H - We should trade CMC. We should have traded him before he ever signed an extension. I called it a bad move then and I still believe it was. If what we're seeing now is an indicator of anything, it is that you can have success without having the highest paid RB in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bronn said:

I'll say this.

I like what I've seen out of Davis AND Bonnafon.

Reggie looks a lot more like CMC than Davis does. But Davis is a grinder that wears out the line to make room for guys like CMC and Reggie.

I'd love to keep all three in the rotation.

TB100%H - We should trade CMC. We should have traded him before he ever signed an extension. I called it a bad move then and I still believe it was. If what we're seeing now is an indicator of anything, it is that you can have success without having the highest paid RB in the league.

But CMC isn’t just any running back. He is a legitimate threat in the passing game and can break the game open with a simple screen pass. Trading him would be insane 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NAS said:

But CMC isn’t just any running back. He is a legitimate threat in the passing game and can break the game open with a simple screen pass. Trading him would be insane 

Not if the haul was worth it.

Davis and Bonnafon have held their own when given the opportunity for the Panthers.

I like CMC and admit what a special talent he is as much as anyone. But if someone offers me two first round picks and some other player(s) that can help solidify my roster for 3-4 years, the deal is done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bronn said:

Not if the haul was worth it.

Davis and Bonnafon have held their own when given the opportunity for the Panthers.

I like CMC and admit what a special talent he is as much as anyone. But if someone offers me two first round picks and some other player(s) that can help solidify my roster for 3-4 years, the deal is done.

I also feel as tho Davis + Bonafon can replace CMC.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gronk is the best TE of all time, but he also played with Brady. Clarke was great, but had Peyton and in an era TE's didn't make crazy money. Kittle is great, but the two times he's made the SB, he was still on his rookie contract for one, and the other the 49ers had Purdy on a cheap rookie deal which help them build the rest of the roster. So again, it's not about not wanting an elite TE, of course it would be nice.  But realistically, in today's NFL, unless that elite TE with a top end TE salary is on a team with a GOAT level QB and/or other serious cap savings (i.e. key players on rookie deals), then I think it's not a good use of cap space.  
    • This place was the poo pre tepper with tons of hilarious posters like phillyB. Joined in the 2000s during the 07 season and have been here bitching about this team since. but yeah its sadly been dying a slow death, every time I come to this site I am surprised its still up. I think the 2015 season was the absolute peak, the Panthers and this board especially just haven't "felt" the same since then. Igo should really sell the board since he clearly doesn't care anymore. Also, Reddit blows and the Bryce defenders on there need Jesus.
    • Guessing the price is too rich here given the injury history.  2024 was brutal and production dropped off in 2025 with a few more injuries (albeit rough qb play).    Don’t really understand the narrative that Young can’t benefit from talented upgrades on offense. Especially here with respect to a tight end. Any QB will benefit from talented receivers that threaten the top of coverage and tight ends with skills to stress zone.    The age and injury history, coupled with what he’s likely asking, just probably means we can better spend that money elsewhere.
×
×
  • Create New...