Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Am I wrong in thinking MLB is our biggest weakness on defense?


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Why do I need to show the play if you saw the game? 

Everybody else here knows what play I'm talking about. How is it that you don't?

You said Boston has a tendency to avoid contact.. This was my point about your criticism being off.. You have mentioned a play that shows him avoiding contact.. But have yet to show it.. I showed plays that prove this criticism of Boston is wrong.. I'm still waiting for you to prove this singular critique..

Atleast say the game.. poo is this that hard for you...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SOJA said:

I'll also add this Shaq has low key looked kinda bad this year. He's been very average. 

I don't think he's proving his contract but I also don't think he's been that bad... Shaq has made a few plays and at this point.. I don't really want to make sweeping judgment on anybody on the defense while they are playing a new scheme with no offseason with rookies every where and Whitehead as the MLB..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

You said Boston has a tendency to avoid contact.. This was my point about your criticism being off.. You have mentioned a play that shows him avoiding contact.. But have yet to show it.. I showed plays that prove this criticism of Boston is wrong.. I'm still waiting for you to prove this singular critique..

Atleast say the game.. poo is this that hard for you...

Again, I'm not looking for highlights because I watched the game. And also again, everyone else knows what play I'm referring to. You're the only one who says he needs to see it.

All of us who've actually seen the games this season have seen numerous examples of Boston either avoiding contact or just outright whiffing (probably more of that, not that it makes things any better).

Talk to me when you can name a play in a game you actually watched rather than googling highlights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Again, I'm not looking for highlights because I watched the game. And also again, everyone else knows what play I'm referring to. You're the only one who says he needs to see it.

All of us who've actually seen the games this season have seen numerous examples of Boston either avoiding contact or just outright whiffing (probably more of that, not that it makes things any better).

Talk to me when you can name a play in a game you actually watched rather than googling highlights.

Cool classic Scott.. Makes a point he's not willing to backup.. Changes the debate multiple times.. Uses and depends on his forum minions to back him up ... Got it... Same playbook same obnoxious prick...lmao..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

Cool classic Scott.. Makes a point he's not willing to backup.. Changes the debate multiple times.. Uses and depends on his forum minions to back him up ... Got it... Same playbook same obnoxious prick...lmao..

Uhhh, no. I've said the same thing multiple times.

You've made it painfully obvious you didn't watch the game, yet you're trying to defend how a player played using highlights.

It's goofy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Uhhh, no. I've said the same thing multiple times.

You've made it painfully obvious you didn't watch the game, yet you're trying to defend how a player played using highlights.

It's goofy.

You won't even name the play or the game.. Just keep saying "everybody knows the play" you should know it if you watched the game" followed by dumb ass guy name Tipper douchebag the third laugh... 

No that's fuging goofy... But again classic Scott..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...