Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Taylor Motion completely shut down Cam Jordan


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Just now, Rags said:

Mind fuging boggling.

Even if we end up having to let Samuel walk we need Moton. Badly.

I've loved what I've seen out of Curtis this year but it's a no brainer IMO. Starting OTs aren't exactly easy to find as all Panthers fans should be painfully aware. Starting OT >>>>>> #3 WR all day everyday no question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Re-signing him is off-season priority #1. Then again, re-signing Bradberry should've been off-season priority #1 last year and we saw how well that worked out. Hopefully we do a better job of identifying priorities this year.

Look I've said all off season and since then that I got the signing over Bradberry because Luke probably let the org. Know sometime after Ron was fired that he was done and done needed  to keep something.

But good lord its getting harder to defend him. He broke so late on so many goddamn passes today and his tackling was matched (technique at least) by fugin Tre today.

Mmmmmmaybe we should've rolled with James.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rags said:

Look I've said all off season and since then that I got the signing over Bradberry because Luke probably let the org. Know sometime after Ron was fired that he was done and done needed  to keep something.

But good lord its getting harder to defend him. He broke so late on so many goddamn passes today and his tackling was matched (technique at least) by fugin Tre today.

Mmmmmmaybe we should've rolled with James.

Yepppp

I hate to lament on would-a, should-a, could-a, but yep. 

It will be critical to identify guys whether draft or FA this coming offseason that are 3+ year plugs minimum at 3 major spots (excluding QB): LB, CB, & C.  No busts, no wasted spent $$.  We'll have cash for the first time in a bit to grab some young and higher level starters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're going to have to overpay now, but we still have to do whatever it takes to keep him. Letting Moton go with the shape of the rest of the OL and the potential turnover there, will honestly set this team back a year.  Backed ourselves into a corner and we're going to have to spend our way out of it here. 

Could need a new LT, C, and who knows at Guard.  I'd expect 2-3 OL drafted next year, but still. Could get ugly real quick if Moton leaves, compounded with Okung retiring/leaving, cutting Paradis, etc. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...