Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Teddy competitive enough?


JABANOG

Recommended Posts

Did you watch any of the game beyond that one play? The guy went toe to toe  with Drew Brees, and came within two feet of tying the game up as time was expiring. All behind a leaky offensive line and with no running game to speak of.

Is Teddy competitive enough? Yeah, hell yeah. He's playing in a division that has three of the best five quarterbacks in the game playing, and he can hang with all of them. Get him an offensive line (which the Bucs, Saints and Falcons all have in spades) and he might be beating each of those guys. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I have no idea. Different people handle things and react to things in different ways. Reading too much into stuff like this is no different than people who read too much into Cam putting a towel on his head on the sideline.

This is totally fire post.. It's almost like a over correction thing... Cam was criticize for stupid poo.. Now some overzealous Cam fans are doing the same to Teddy..

I don't get this poo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recall Watson and Mahomes sitting beside each other as a joke when one of them ran out of bounds. Teddy wants to win and rally his teammates, but he isn’t going to “hate” his opponents. He just isn’t wired that way. I see him pat defenders on the back all the time after they make a play on him in the backfield. He is a solid player, but I think he will be a great coach/coordinator one day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JABANOG said:

Is Teddy competitive enough? During that last drive when he sits on the saints bench with Brees joking around on a game winning drive. Where is his edge? 

DJ Moore will never act like 89.  Teddy will never act like Tom Brady.   

Megatron was okay not acting like 89.  Brett Favre was okay not  acting like Brady. 

Personalities vary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...