Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

F U NFL


Zod

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

He had the snap timed perfectly. We need some hard counts and to change up our snap timing.

We use hard counts regularly. And Bridgewater has a pretty good one. He's drawn several offsides penalties this season.

Unfortunately, today he only drew Robby Anderson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, shaqattaq said:

That PI on Samuel after the lb knocked him on his ass was insane.

That was crazy!!!!!!!!! I yelled at the TV!!! It's like the Refs wanted to stop our momentum, so they came up with some BS call!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Cary Kollins said:

As bad as Slye missed that kick, five yards wasn’t helping. Hell teddy probably throws another check down if that offsides is called and maybe the RB doesn’t miraculously make it out of bounds to stop the clock. 

I disagree. He used all his leg to short a 65 yarder by a foot on what was otherwise a perfect kick. You tell him he now needs to add another 2 yards in the wind, it's like telling a golfer to add yardage to his career longest drive. At that point all you can really do it Happy Gilmore that poo and see if you just luck into hitting the sweet spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Harbingers said:

It's not offsides. It's a neutral zone infraction. He was in the neutral zone before the ball was snapped. Watch the video.

A neutral zone infraction is movement into the neutral zone that causes the offense to move before the snap.

Offsides is being in or beyond the neutral zone at the time of the snap.

The penalty would be offsides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bartin said:

A neutral zone infraction is movement into the neutral zone that causes the offense to move before the snap.

Offsides is being in or beyond the neutral zone at the time of the snap.

The penalty would be offsides.

Unless your the Panthers then a neutral zone infraction is a false start by the offense and is flagged as such. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To kick this up, The Athletic has a really comprehensive piece out where pretty much all QB questions are addressed. It is worth seeing.  https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7083539/2026/03/04/starting-quarterback-projections-free-agency-draft/?source=user_shared_article I’m putting something specific here but it should have a thread or something. It is an extensive exercise.  This is a dense write up with a lot of column inches used, about the Jets and Murray and Reich, all this stuff.. then it goes to backup QB and there is Dalton.  I am pasting that part: As for Dalton, Reich is installing the offense he was trying to run in Carolina in 2023 before he got fired, and Dalton was with the Panthers then; he’s an ideal option as a veteran backup to replace Taylor. Reich said this about Dalton in 2023: “The way he's throwing the football, the way he works through progressions, the way he handles the operation. … Since day one (when) he walked in the door, I'm like, 'This guy is starter-worthy.' You guys know I've said that all along. He's, in my opinion, one of the best 32 quarterbacks in the world.” ——— That’s true love lol. I never heard any of this. Pretty crazy I think, considering how the year went.   Anyway the dream is not dead. . 
    • The Seahawks traded for wide receiver/returner Rashid Shaheed at the trade deadline. He proved to be a key acquisition. Shaheed returned a punt and a kickoff for touchdowns in the regular season and had a 95-yard kickoff return in the postseason. Shaheed, though, is scheduled for free agency. So, the 12 games he played, including the postseason, might be the extent of his time in Seattle. Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that Shaheed and the Seahawks are not close to an extension, and the expectation is that the two-time Pro Bowler will hit free agency. Shaheed has 153 receptions for 2,243 yards and 12 touchdowns in his four-year career to go along with three punt return touchdowns and a kickoff return touchdown. He ranks 13th on PFT’s top-100 free agents. https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/report-rashid-shaheed-appears-headed-to-free-agency
×
×
  • Create New...