Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trey Lance vs Zach Wilson official poll


which one  

67 members have voted

  1. 1. Qb?

    • Zach Wilson
      41
    • Trey Lance
      26


Recommended Posts

Lance will be a tougher sell due to not really playing this year and being raw as hell anyways, but I’m a big fan of his. Wilson has looked amazing as well though and can make all the throws with some natural traits as well. You can’t go wrong with either, but I also don’t think either can step in and start from day 1. That’s where Teddy will come in handy for a year or two as a mentor to whichever one we take. Hell, we may even make the playoffs with Teddy which would be nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ImaginaryKev said:

I could literally see us waiting a year on QB and getting the roster ready for the next guy. If that's the case we'd go for someone like Micah Parsons or whoever ends up being CB1

Im of this opinion as well. I see us going QB in 2022 maybe even 2023 if everything keeps going like it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Rhule is a homer after all. I could see us drafting another need position in the first and grabbing him later on.

We didn't draft a Baylor player until the 6th round. Everyone had us drafting James Lynch, even as early as the 2nd round. He went in the late 4th after we'd already made 4 draft selections. We picked Troy Pride Jr. over James Lynch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same worry I have for Lance is the worry I have for Wilson... it’s more or less all based off of one year. Nobody was going to write home about Wilson’s freshman or sophomore campaigns and outside of one game this year for Lance we have one season to go off, and just this season for Wilson. 
 

In this poll, I voted for Wilson though right now but I’d need to see a lot more tape to really make a call. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Per Adam Schefter: https://x.com/AdamSchefter/status/1920523706624823739 Expected, but just want to rub it in here.
    • I try to keep up and project the roster with color-coded charts.  You can see priorities and gauge who has the best chance of making the roster--you can see the priorities as well.  Here, Yellow is a 2025 draft pick, green is an undrafted free agent, and orange is a free agent. The depth chart will obviously change and I am not sure about roles (positions in all cases), so that is not the real issue at this time, but yellows and oranges show how the team focused on which aspects of the defense:     In the front 5, there were 3 draft picks, 3 free agents (not including players we re-signed), and two undrafted players signed. In the back 6, there was 1 draft pick and 2 free agents (LB, S), and four undrafted free agents. The undrafted free agents are always long shots, but by identifying them, you can tell which longshots might make the roster.
    • The rise of analytics in sports goes back to the use of sabermetrics in baseball.  The ironic thing is that the whole point of Bill James work was to objectively figure out each players contribution to to a team's wins throughout the season.  This is possible in baseball because each at bat is essentially a 1v1 with an objective outcome.  Applying statistical averages also works a lot better with hundreds of plate appearances over 162 games a year. PFF grades plays subjectively, and then puts them into buckets.  They then create different statistics based on those buckets.  That's all well and good and I'm not saying it's useless.  But calling it analytics like it's some kind of objective science is a far cry from what is actually going on.
×
×
  • Create New...