Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CBS early mock. Just a fun conjecture this Tuesday


raleigh-panther

Recommended Posts

As I have said before. I just want someone behind Teddington so I can quit worrying the coaching staff actually thinks he can be the franchise QB. As long as that doesn’t happen I will be worried he will be here after 3 years. 
I like Walker but he isn’t an NFL starter. Once teams get film on him he’ll struggle, like Kyle Allen, who has a better arm than Teddy. 
I hope they get their QB this offseason because if not I may be done with the Panthers for a while. 
Hard to support a team when I can’t stand the guy under center. If it wasn’t for Teddy I probably wouldn’t have any problem with them winning a few games down the stretch. But every win lowers our draft stock and makes Bathwater potentially remaining here that much closer. 
Because let’s face it. If we don’t get a QB this draft we will likely not get one in 2022 or 2023 unless we pay big and move up in the draft. 
Of course we could still have things go badly for us and be devastated by injuries and go 2-14 next year. Kinda like the 49ers. Who knows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Fields, Lance, Wilson. Honestly, I don't care. I just hope the one we like best is available for us.

And that's the worry. People just want a QB because they don't think Bridgewater is the guy.

There's no way Lawrence, Fields, Lance and Wilson all pan out. It just doesn't happen that way in the NFL.

Lawrence is off the board for us. Fields probably is too - but he's also only started for a season and a half, which is a worry.

So you're left looking at Lance, who terrifies me as he's dominated an awful level of football for a single year - he's a massive project that ideally you take in the third round based on measurables. Then Wilson, who I need to see more of, but I'm less enthused than I used to be. 

Then you throw in Jones who's getting first round hype and Trask who should probably win the Heisman at this point.

Six first round QBs? Mental. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

And that's the worry. People just want a QB because they don't think Bridgewater is the guy.

There's no way Lawrence, Fields, Lance and Wilson all pan out. It just doesn't happen that way in the NFL.

Lawrence is off the board for us. Fields probably is too - but he's also only started for a season and a half, which is a worry.

So you're left looking at Lance, who terrifies me as he's dominated an awful level of football for a single year - he's a massive project that ideally you take in the third round based on measurables. Then Wilson, who I need to see more of, but I'm less enthused than I used to be. 

Then you throw in Jones who's getting first round hype and Trask who should probably win the Heisman at this point.

Six first round QBs? Mental. 

Teddy isn't the answer, but I don't want any QB. Read what I wrote carefully without your previous bias altering your comprehension of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Yaboychris28 said:

By why not Kyle Trask?

A- plays better competition 

B- has better stats than Joe Burrow at this point 

C- not an unknown small school player. 

Probably fundamentals. Watch his throwing motion.. something about it is weird to me. Dan has a great track record with QBs though (Dak, Alex Smith, etc.) but remember The Golden Calf of Bristol as well. Phenomenal college QB, bad NFL QB. I'm a MSU alum so I watched him take 2 star Nick Fitzgerald and get him on Heisman watch lists

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Probably fundamentals. Watch his throwing motion.. something about it is weird to me. Dan has a great track record with QBs though (Dak, Alex Smith, etc.) but remember The Golden Calf of Bristol as well. Phenomenal college QB, bad NFL QB. I'm a MSU alum so I watched him take 2 star Nick Fitzgerald and get him on Heisman watch lists

A MSU fan myself. Mullins really can develop a qb. Hail State!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yaboychris28 said:

By why not Kyle Trask?

A- plays better competition 

B- has better stats than Joe Burrow at this point 

C- not an unknown small school player. 

There's serious questions about how well his traits transfer to the NFL. In the Florida games I've watched, there have been a receivers winning a bunch of 50/50 balls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Probably fundamentals. Watch his throwing motion.. something about it is weird to me. Dan has a great track record with QBs though (Dak, Alex Smith, etc.) but remember The Golden Calf of Bristol as well. Phenomenal college QB, bad NFL QB. I'm a MSU alum so I watched him take 2 star Nick Fitzgerald and get him on Heisman watch lists

Motion reminds me of a mix between Wentz and Andrew Luck. It's a bit of a long windup like Wentz, but the second half of the throw looks like when Luck would throw.

I don't know what to think about him. I think Wilson is more accurate with a stronger arm and better mobility, but I think Trask could run our offense well. He does a lot of quick hits and reads to his receivers but airs it out every once in a while each game. From what limited film I have seen, his receivers (Specifically Pitts) are better at receiver than he is at placing the ball. He throws quite a few 50/50 balls up for grabs for his receivers to get, not a ton of hitting guys in stride. 

I'll look into him more at a later time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not exactly sure that is an honest assesment of the talent he had to work with that year. Olsen had over 1100 yards that season making the PB, Stewart had close to 1100 total yards also going to the PB. He had Kalil at C who went to the PB, Trai Turner at RG who also went to the PB, and Michael Oher at LT who played well enough that the Panthers offered him a new contract the following year. I wouldn't call that a trash OL. He also played with a defense that was stacked with talent as well.   "The thing we are doing better this time around is actually surrounding our #1 overall draft pick QB with talent vs. asking him to completely carry the offense. I just hope that effort is leading us to realize that the guy isn't even good enough to get carried." Please.... Did you not read the list of names Newton had to work with his rookie season. I guess you missed it so I will post it again for you... Steve Smith (PB), Greg Olsen (PB), Brandon LaFell, Ted Ginn JR, Deangelo Williams (PB), Jonathan Stewart (PB), Jordan Grossn (PB), Ryan Kalil (PB) on the offensive side and then he had Luke Kuechly (PB), Jon Beason (PB), Thomas Davis (PB), Star Lotulelei, Kawann Short ( PB ),Charles Johnson, Greg Hardy (PB ), Mike Mitchell, Josh Norman (PB)  For comparison, here is who Young had his first year.  Chuba Hubbard, DJ Chark, Jonathan Mingo, Adam Thielen, Hayden Hurst, Ikem Ekwonu, Chandler Zavala, Bradley Bozeman, Nash Jensen and Taylor Morton. Not a single PB player on the list and most of them aren't even playing any longer. Additionally, his HC was fired during the season and the defense was as bad as the offense.  You might not like the comparison but saying Newton had to completely carry the offense isn't exactly fair to the 4 pro bowlers on offense who played with him that year.
    • That's why I say we have to keep looking. Even if you believe Bryce is the guy, KP and Grier are not and who knows if King is anything more than a gimmick player, we should be active in improving our 2nd QB spot. Season ending injuries happen, and you don't just want to roll over and give it up. How many starters have we seen come from the ranks of backup? Having 2 potential starting QBs is one of the best problems we could have. 
    • Eh, it’s more on how bad the refs are. Some of these calls against the canes are no calls 
×
×
  • Create New...