Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CBS early mock. Just a fun conjecture this Tuesday

raleigh-panther

By raleigh-panther,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted

As I have said before. I just want someone behind Teddington so I can quit worrying the coaching staff actually thinks he can be the franchise QB. As long as that doesn’t happen I will be worried he will be here after 3 years. 
I like Walker but he isn’t an NFL starter. Once teams get film on him he’ll struggle, like Kyle Allen, who has a better arm than Teddy. 
I hope they get their QB this offseason because if not I may be done with the Panthers for a while. 
Hard to support a team when I can’t stand the guy under center. If it wasn’t for Teddy I probably wouldn’t have any problem with them winning a few games down the stretch. But every win lowers our draft stock and makes Bathwater potentially remaining here that much closer. 
Because let’s face it. If we don’t get a QB this draft we will likely not get one in 2022 or 2023 unless we pay big and move up in the draft. 
Of course we could still have things go badly for us and be devastated by injuries and go 2-14 next year. Kinda like the 49ers. Who knows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Fields, Lance, Wilson. Honestly, I don't care. I just hope the one we like best is available for us.

And that's the worry. People just want a QB because they don't think Bridgewater is the guy.

There's no way Lawrence, Fields, Lance and Wilson all pan out. It just doesn't happen that way in the NFL.

Lawrence is off the board for us. Fields probably is too - but he's also only started for a season and a half, which is a worry.

So you're left looking at Lance, who terrifies me as he's dominated an awful level of football for a single year - he's a massive project that ideally you take in the third round based on measurables. Then Wilson, who I need to see more of, but I'm less enthused than I used to be. 

Then you throw in Jones who's getting first round hype and Trask who should probably win the Heisman at this point.

Six first round QBs? Mental. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

And that's the worry. People just want a QB because they don't think Bridgewater is the guy.

There's no way Lawrence, Fields, Lance and Wilson all pan out. It just doesn't happen that way in the NFL.

Lawrence is off the board for us. Fields probably is too - but he's also only started for a season and a half, which is a worry.

So you're left looking at Lance, who terrifies me as he's dominated an awful level of football for a single year - he's a massive project that ideally you take in the third round based on measurables. Then Wilson, who I need to see more of, but I'm less enthused than I used to be. 

Then you throw in Jones who's getting first round hype and Trask who should probably win the Heisman at this point.

Six first round QBs? Mental. 

Teddy isn't the answer, but I don't want any QB. Read what I wrote carefully without your previous bias altering your comprehension of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, Yaboychris28 said:

By why not Kyle Trask?

A- plays better competition 

B- has better stats than Joe Burrow at this point 

C- not an unknown small school player. 

Probably fundamentals. Watch his throwing motion.. something about it is weird to me. Dan has a great track record with QBs though (Dak, Alex Smith, etc.) but remember The Golden Calf of Bristol as well. Phenomenal college QB, bad NFL QB. I'm a MSU alum so I watched him take 2 star Nick Fitzgerald and get him on Heisman watch lists

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mccjeff Experienced

mccjeff

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Probably fundamentals. Watch his throwing motion.. something about it is weird to me. Dan has a great track record with QBs though (Dak, Alex Smith, etc.) but remember The Golden Calf of Bristol as well. Phenomenal college QB, bad NFL QB. I'm a MSU alum so I watched him take 2 star Nick Fitzgerald and get him on Heisman watch lists

A MSU fan myself. Mullins really can develop a qb. Hail State!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Yaboychris28 said:

By why not Kyle Trask?

A- plays better competition 

B- has better stats than Joe Burrow at this point 

C- not an unknown small school player. 

There's serious questions about how well his traits transfer to the NFL. In the Florida games I've watched, there have been a receivers winning a bunch of 50/50 balls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Spanish Grand Master

Ricky Spanish

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Probably fundamentals. Watch his throwing motion.. something about it is weird to me. Dan has a great track record with QBs though (Dak, Alex Smith, etc.) but remember The Golden Calf of Bristol as well. Phenomenal college QB, bad NFL QB. I'm a MSU alum so I watched him take 2 star Nick Fitzgerald and get him on Heisman watch lists

Motion reminds me of a mix between Wentz and Andrew Luck. It's a bit of a long windup like Wentz, but the second half of the throw looks like when Luck would throw.

I don't know what to think about him. I think Wilson is more accurate with a stronger arm and better mobility, but I think Trask could run our offense well. He does a lot of quick hits and reads to his receivers but airs it out every once in a while each game. From what limited film I have seen, his receivers (Specifically Pitts) are better at receiver than he is at placing the ball. He throws quite a few 50/50 balls up for grabs for his receivers to get, not a ton of hitting guys in stride. 

I'll look into him more at a later time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      About as useful as the S2
    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...