Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Current draft range (3rd to 15th)


Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D.

Recommended Posts

I don't think falling to 7-8 is the end of the world, as that's maybe where the 3rd QB comes off the board.  Falling out of the Top 10 is downright depressing.  Please God let us lose out...the draft pick value is worth it, the potential trade ammo is worth it, we need to lose out. 

Also not convinced the Jets take Fields at 2 if they end up there.  There's a difference in trading away the rights to Lawrence and the rights to Fields.  A trade down to 4-5 with us if we love Fields, for them to grab some extra pick and take Wilson could happen.  Granted, we might like Wilson/Lance/whoever and stay put, but we need options that only losing gives right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. said:

They also have the 5-9 Chargers ahead of us. They obviously have no Fkin clue what they are talking about. Not to mention they have us taking a TE.  Whoever wrote that is a moron. 

 

sorry, I posted the wrong link.   CBS has us picking a TE, and yes they are morons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CanadianCat said:

Assuming things stay where they are, how many calls will the Bengals have for Teams to jump a head of us and grab a QB?...

It will be interesting---will Lance or Wilson go 3rd?  If so, Sewell is still on the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Beerfacedlegend said:

Say falcons lose out as well are they ahead of us?

We play the Redskins and Saints. The Redskins are 6-8 and Saints are 10-4. The Falcons play Kansas City and Tampa Bay. KC is 13-1 and Tampa Bay is 9-5. Thus, if we both lose our remaining two games we will have the weaker strength of schedule, which would give us the tiebreaker over the Falcons.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, FakePlasticTrees said:

We play the Redskins and Saints. The Redskins are 6-8 and Saints are 10-4. The Falcons play Kansas City and Tampa Bay. KC is 13-1 and Tampa Bay is 9-5. Thus, if we both lose our remaining two games we will have the weaker strength of schedule, which would give us the tiebreaker over the Falcons.

 

 

That’s not how it works

It’s mentioned on the previous page

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

That’s not how it works

It’s mentioned on the previous page

Perhaps I should have specified that the Panthers do currently have a weaker strength of schedule over the Falcons; thus, I do believe this is how it would work between the Panthers and Falcons. The weaker strength of schedule of the Panthers is also the reason that the Panthers would pick before the Falcons if the season ended today.

 

Edit: I think I know what you are referring to i. e. that strength of schedule changes each week as the records of the teams played changes. Unfortunately, Those unknowns can’t be calculated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Draft position matters, however I'm more curious who our new GM will be and what he thinks about this QB class. If we are top 5, how aggressive will our new GM be in wanting to trade up to top 2-3 for HIS QB? New people in position of power = a lot of uncertainty however it's exciting as well. Saints have traded the farm for Ricky Williams before right? lol, obviously that didn't turn out well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Baker was never at any point in his career a bust except maybe with Carolina, in which we set him up to fail to save the coach/GM. Darnold appears to potentially be a new Geno. I would give it at least another season before I am ready to make that leap. Another guy that would have never been successful here. Jones was never a true bust, IMO. Average to below average starting QB. Also his "ascension" is far from assured. This was far more fan hype as a "bust" than actual reality, IMO. Still TBD, ultimately.  MAC Jones is the same middling game manager QB he was in New England but in a Kyle Shanahan offense. So, if you think Mac Jones is now a "success" is Brock Purdy an elite QB? Is he middle of the road?
    • I’ll answer your question even though you won’t answer mine for some reason. I’m asking you because you were the one who brought up the threat of banning with Icege a few weeks ago and also because I’ve seen in the past a poster that you were disagreeing with get banned basically mid argument and the reason given was that they were a “single issue poster”, but I haven’t seen the same standard applied to people who align more closely with your opinions. OP is one of the most obvious and trashy trolls I’ve seen and yet I’ve noticed you specifically promoting his dead threading to gloat about the Panthers QB being bad.
    • No way do they give him a contract Keep him through year 4 but on the bench and get brisset for next year find that qb in 2027 draft seen enough  nothing short of a prolific offensive showing over the remaining  games against decent opponents justifies keeping him in a starting role next year  ..or Canales as offensive coordinator 
×
×
  • Create New...