Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wilson character issues.


Rags

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Yes they are.  Watch the video the dude from Walter football quotes just that and attributes it all to Hurney.  Like I said its not factual.

And you do not measure GMs by players who make the pro bowl.   You judge GMs by players who make the super bowl. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, USC/panthers_11 said:

Thanks, but there was only 1 poster involved in this thread. 

I think it’s still good form to handle it this way though. Tell people penalties might happen and if anyone keeps it up even if they weren’t that one user it’ll lead to time outs for everyone involved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, top dawg said:

I hope Charlie Campbell is wrong about Tepper, but he did get my attention when he essentially said in so many words that Tepper seems to be trying to "reinvent the wheel."

Unlike most, it is interesting that while not specifically naming names, this guy Campbell does at least give the NFL position of many of his sources...

...as for Tepper, he's definitely not employing the "traditional" (some might say archaic) NFL-model to run the Panthers...

...but he's not "reinventing" anything either --- he's simply continuing to operate within the decades-proven model that allowed Appaloosa Management to secure its rightful place in the Hedge Fund Hall of Fame.

Said model is readily transportable...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Unlike most, it is interesting that while not specifically naming names, this guy Campbell does at least give the NFL position of many of his sources...

...as for Tepper, he's definitely not employing the "traditional" (some might say archaic) NFL-model to run the Panthers...

...but he's not "reinventing" anything either --- he's simply continuing to operate within the decades-proven model that allowed Appaloosa Management to secure its rightful place in the Hedge Fund Hall of Fame.

Said model is readily transportable...

I don't know about Appaloosa, but I will say that the Steelers' model has been a successful one, and their modus operandi on and off the field has been decidedly old school and hard to argue against! I'm almost certain that Tepper is sticking closely to that model, with his own---perhaps more modern---tweaks!

I ain't hatin' on him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, top dawg said:

I don't know about Appaloosa, but I will say that the Steelers' model has been a successful one, and their modus operandi on and off the field has been decidedly old school and hard to argue against! I'm almost certain that Tepper is sticking closely to that model, with his own---perhaps more modern---tweaks!

I ain't hatin' on him!

100% concur on the obvious success the Steelers have had --- but the Steelers model isn't the only model that can be successful in the NFL.

As for the Steelers and Tepper....he was nothing more than a passive investor there (5% stake)  and had no involvement whatsoever in team operations --- in no way is he steeped in or beholden to the way the Rooney family runs the team. 

Tepper's already show PLENTY to allow for a definitive conclusion that the "old school" Rooney model ain't how he's going to run the Panthers!

 

EDIT >> Here's a passage about the 2 guys who bought Tepper's 5% stake in the Steelers:

"Their stake in the Steelers is believed to be the proportion of the team vacated by David Tepper, who bought the Carolina Panthers in 2018 for an estimated $2.3 billion. When Tepper bought the Panthers, he had to give up his stake in the Steelers. Harris and Blitzer will reportedly have no input in operations of the Steelers. "

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/76ers-devils-majority-owners-acquire-a-small-stake-in-steelers-per-report/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SizzleBuzz said:

100% concur on the obvious success the Steelers have had --- but the Steelers model isn't the only model that can be successful in the NFL.

As for the Steelers and Tepper....he was nothing more than a passive investor there (5% stake)  and had no involvement whatsoever in team operations --- in no way is he steeped in or beholden to the way the Rooney family runs the team. 

Tepper's already show PLENTY to allow for a definitive conclusion that the "old school" Rooney model ain't how he's going to run the Panthers!

 

EDIT >> Here's a passage about the 2 guys who bought Tepper's 5% stake in the Steelers:

"Their stake in the Steelers is believed to be the proportion of the team vacated by David Tepper, who bought the Carolina Panthers in 2018 for an estimated $2.3 billion. When Tepper bought the Panthers, he had to give up his stake in the Steelers. Harris and Blitzer will reportedly have no input in operations of the Steelers. "

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/76ers-devils-majority-owners-acquire-a-small-stake-in-steelers-per-report/

 

I agree to a point, but I don't know all the "plenty" differences. I mentioned that he would probably tweak his approach. I was already aware that he didn't have any say-so in the operations of the team, but he did have a front row seat as to the way they do things. He has already hired one Steelers exec, and if I were betting, I'd say that Colbert will be the next GM of the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, top dawg said:

I agree to a point, but I don't know all the "plenty" differences.

I was already aware that he didn't have any say-so in the operations of the team, but he did have a front row seat as to the way they do things.

Where shall we start? 

Do you think the Rooney's gave even a minute of thought to putting Colin Kaepernick's closest ally on their roster?

How did that particular move align with the Rooney's and their "old school" modus operandi?

In this day and age, we all have a front row seat....including you.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Baker was never at any point in his career a bust except maybe with Carolina, in which we set him up to fail to save the coach/GM. Darnold appears to potentially be a new Geno. I would give it at least another season before I am ready to make that leap. Another guy that would have never been successful here. Jones was never a true bust, IMO. Average to below average starting QB. Also his "ascension" is far from assured. This was far more fan hype as a "bust" than actual reality, IMO. Still TBD, ultimately.  MAC Jones is the same middling game manager QB he was in New England but in a Kyle Shanahan offense. So, if you think Mac Jones is now a "success" is Brock Purdy an elite QB? Is he middle of the road?
    • I’ll answer your question even though you won’t answer mine for some reason. I’m asking you because you were the one who brought up the threat of banning with Icege a few weeks ago and also because I’ve seen in the past a poster that you were disagreeing with get banned basically mid argument and the reason given was that they were a “single issue poster”, but I haven’t seen the same standard applied to people who align more closely with your opinions. OP is one of the most obvious and trashy trolls I’ve seen and yet I’ve noticed you specifically promoting his dead threading to gloat about the Panthers QB being bad.
    • No way do they give him a contract Keep him through year 4 but on the bench and get brisset for next year find that qb in 2027 draft seen enough  nothing short of a prolific offensive showing over the remaining  games against decent opponents justifies keeping him in a starting role next year  ..or Canales as offensive coordinator 
×
×
  • Create New...