Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dane Bruglers updated top 10 mock draft


Martin

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Ja Rhule said:

Lance will be the best QB in draft.  I’m telling ya.  He’s very similar to Aaron Rodgers.

Lance is not like Aaron Rodgers.  Trey Lance is Cam Newton lite.  It's really that simple.  And all due respect, but he's played against far lesser competition in his college career than Cam did.

People really need to spend some time actually watching Trey Lance play. 

Watch his footwork against James Madison for example.  Lazy feet in the pocket.  Not sure why, because he didn't show it in other games, but it was clearly there in the biggest game he played.  A number of balls low or in the dirt.  Even the TD that was called back was low.

Here's a game vs Delaware.  Again, watch how many balls he throws low.  You also see him late and long, high, wide.  For every really nice throw he makes - and he makes some - there is another questionable one.

Against SDSU.  Leaves the deep ball short multiple times.  Deep ball long.

How about against UND?  Statistically one of his better games.  Balls are high and wide.  Deep ball inaccurate / wrong shoulders the WR.  Deep ball short.  Even the underneath route TD to the TE was a bad read.  He had a man open in the end zone.

What about 2020, his only game?  High.  Long.  Wide.  Low.  Poor ball placement leads on an INT.  Short on a deep throw to win the game.  The TD that did win the game?  Poorly placed and short.

And over and over in all of them, what you see is NDSU relying on Trey Lance to make a play with his legs.  Watch the hits he takes.  Over and over.  I can't be excited about that again.  The punishment catches up way too fast in the NFL.  Cams career was shortened by the blows he took, and I don't want to see us take another QB who plays with his legs, and ends up out of the game way before his time.

Trey Lance is Cam Newton, just not as good.  He's shown me nothing as a passer that any other 2nd round QB hasn't shown.  This is not the QB our system needs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Lance is not like Aaron Rodgers.  Trey Lance is Cam Newton lite.  It's really that simple.  And all due respect, but he's played against far lesser competition in his college career than Cam did.

People really need to spend some time actually watching Trey Lance play. 

Watch his footwork against James Madison for example.  Lazy feet in the pocket.  Not sure why, because he didn't show it in other games, but it was clearly there in the biggest game he played.  A number of balls low or in the dirt.  Even the TD that was called back was low.

Here's a game vs Delaware.  Again, watch how many balls he throws low.  You also see him late and long, high, wide.  For every really nice throw he makes - and he makes some - there is another questionable one.

Against SDSU.  Leaves the deep ball short multiple times.  Deep ball long.

How about against UND?  Statistically one of his better games.  Balls are high and wide.  Deep ball inaccurate / wrong shoulders the WR.  Deep ball short.  Even the underneath route TD to the TE was a bad read.  He had a man open in the end zone.

What about 2020, his only game?  High.  Long.  Wide.  Low.  Poor ball placement leads on an INT.  Short on a deep throw to win the game.  The TD that did win the game?  Poorly placed and short.

And over and over in all of them, what you see is NDSU relying on Trey Lance to make a play with his legs.  Watch the hits he takes.  Over and over.  I can't be excited about that again.  The punishment catches up way too fast in the NFL.  Cams career was shortened by the blows he took, and I don't want to see us take another QB who plays with his legs, and ends up out of the game way before his time.

Trey Lance is Cam Newton, just not as good.  He's shown me nothing as a passer that any other 2nd round QB hasn't shown.  This is not the QB our system needs.  

49 TDs, one pick and undefeated.  Not too shabby.  I think I'll take my chances with him, especially if he's not expected to start right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Lance is not like Aaron Rodgers.  Trey Lance is Cam Newton lite.  It's really that simple.  And all due respect, but he's played against far lesser competition in his college career than Cam did.

People really need to spend some time actually watching Trey Lance play. 

Watch his footwork against James Madison for example.  Lazy feet in the pocket.  Not sure why, because he didn't show it in other games, but it was clearly there in the biggest game he played.  A number of balls low or in the dirt.  Even the TD that was called back was low.

Here's a game vs Delaware.  Again, watch how many balls he throws low.  You also see him late and long, high, wide.  For every really nice throw he makes - and he makes some - there is another questionable one.

Against SDSU.  Leaves the deep ball short multiple times.  Deep ball long.

How about against UND?  Statistically one of his better games.  Balls are high and wide.  Deep ball inaccurate / wrong shoulders the WR.  Deep ball short.  Even the underneath route TD to the TE was a bad read.  He had a man open in the end zone.

What about 2020, his only game?  High.  Long.  Wide.  Low.  Poor ball placement leads on an INT.  Short on a deep throw to win the game.  The TD that did win the game?  Poorly placed and short.

And over and over in all of them, what you see is NDSU relying on Trey Lance to make a play with his legs.  Watch the hits he takes.  Over and over.  I can't be excited about that again.  The punishment catches up way too fast in the NFL.  Cams career was shortened by the blows he took, and I don't want to see us take another QB who plays with his legs, and ends up out of the game way before his time.

Trey Lance is Cam Newton, just not as good.  He's shown me nothing as a passer that any other 2nd round QB hasn't shown.  This is not the QB our system needs.  

You can literally do this with every single prospect including Lawrence. The best comp I’ve seen of Lance is McNair. Lance shows elite NFL traits, what you want is for him to show those consistently in the NFL. That’s why he’s considered raw or needs more development. Lawrence shows them more consistently for instance. But this is why teams and scouts are excited about Lance. You can debate if we should take him at 9. I think we should but I get people who would pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

49 TDs, one pick and undefeated.  Not too shabby.  I think I'll take my chances with him, especially if he's not expected to start right away.

Lance talent is amazing but he’s raw and need to sit for a year.  Dude is huge, fast and got a cannon.  His throwing motion os identical to Rodgers and Russell Wilson. You can’t teach that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

Lance has over 1k rushing yards in 2019.  Don’t ignore that fact.  He has over 200 total yards in almost all games.

I need my quarterback to throw the ball. 200 yards isn’t a huge ask. He was averaging 155 passing yards a game. 38.75 passing yards a quarter. Don’t ignore the fact that in their biggest game of the season last year they asked him to only throw 10 times. They asked him to run 30 times. If I had a true top 10 pick QB at my FBS school I’d take full advantage of throwing. 
If you have Zach Wilson do you just throw the ball 10 times and lean on the run? No, because throwing the ball is a strength of what he does. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

You can literally do this with every single prospect including Lawrence. The best comp I’ve seen of Lance is McNair. Lance shows elite NFL traits, what you want is for him to show those consistently in the NFL. That’s why he’s considered raw or needs more development. Lawrence shows them more consistently for instance. But this is why teams and scouts are excited about Lance. You can debate if we should take him at 9. I think we should but I get people who would pass.

Elite NFL traits?  Really?  What are they?  I don't consider rushing an "Elite NFL trait", though I grant that he looks good against weak competition when running QB runs.  His deep ball accuracy is suspect.  His overall accuracy and placement are suspect.  His mechanics are inconsistent. 

If we want a developmental prospect, I'd far prefer to see us take a guy in the 2nd round like Mac Jones or Kyle Trask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Elite NFL traits?  Really?  What are they?  I don't consider rushing an "Elite NFL trait", though I grant that he looks good against weak competition when running QB runs.  His deep ball accuracy is suspect.  His overall accuracy and placement are suspect.  His mechanics are inconsistent. 

If we want a developmental prospect, I'd far prefer to see us take a guy in the 2nd round like Mac Jones or Kyle Trask.

Watch the vid I posted on page 2. Those guys go through 2019 cut ups showing off his elite traits and how they transfer to the nfl. Including his mechanics, footwork, his pocket awareness, his arm strength, ball placement using context. They want to see more of it, but he has shown the ability. Hence why myself and others have said I’d like to see him sit for a year and learn. Get a full two offseason of nfl workouts, practice and learning. They do talk about his low ball placement and how that’s gonna be an issue for him among other things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ideally Bryce and the other starters should get at least a full quarter and an argument could be made for 2 full quarters given how they've played early in the season the last few years.
    • A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...