Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Draft Network Mock Draft(Panthers Trade up to 3)


kungfoodude

Recommended Posts

https://thedraftnetwork.com/articles/2021-nfl-mock-draft-marino-4.0

Quote

TRADE: Carolina receives 3rd overall pick from Miami in exchange for 8th overall pick, 72nd overall pick, 2022 first-round pick.

The Panthers showed some promise in Year 1 of the Matt Rhule era and the next phase of the rebuilding process for Carolina is finding its next franchise quarterback. In striking distance to land an exciting new option, the Panthers should be thinking about a move up the board. With Miami being only one year removed from drafting Tua Tagovailoa with the No. 5 overall selection and earning the No. 3 pick courtesy of the Laremy Tunsil trade and a poor season from the Texans, trading back to build the talent around Tagovailoa is a wise move. The Dolphins and Panthers are perfect trade partners. Wilson is a dynamic quarterback prospect that fits nicely with how the NFL game is trending and would provide Carolina with a potential difference-maker at the position. With a fairly complete set of weapons already in place and all the investments made on the defensive side of the football, Carolina is ready to pick a quarterback high in the draft.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Honestly I think you could get away with 2021 #8 and #40 to make that trade and now worry about 2022.

100% disagree. There are going to be a lot of teams gunning for that pick and a future 1st will be a bare minimum. 

Denver, San Francisco, New England, Detroit, Washington, Chicago are all candidates to trade up, IMO. There are so many QB needy teams and this is a very, very valuable draft to snag a QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

We really don't need a new thread for every new mock draft that gets released

Yeah, because we need more threads about Teddy's post game comments or every new GM candidate. 

It's the offseason, I suggest you hibernate if you don't want to see reach threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Huddler said:

If its for our franchise guy who will win SBs, then its worth it.

 

kinda annoying beating Washington cost us a 1st round pick .. 

I think a lot is going to depend on how all these QB evaluations pan out. There is a pretty big pool of first round caliber QB's(Lawrence, Fields, Wilson, Lance, Jones, Trask). Does a guy like Wilson or Lance fall? Does Fields fall? Does Jones shoot up the boards? 

It's really tough to say at the moment. These boards are 98% pure speculation and less about actual in depth evaluation and mining team sources. I will say that TDN does some of the best prospect evaluation around, IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

If its for our franchise guy who will win SBs, then its worth it.

 

kinda annoying beating Washington cost us a 1st round pick .. 

Yep, the same people who didn’t want us to tank might be ok with trading up. There’s a reason why us tankers didn’t want to win any games. Wouldn’t it be nice to have pick 3 already and also be able to keep pick 72 and 2021 first? I mean if we were playoff teams already like KC and Houston were, trading a future first to get the one piece (QB) you needed isn’t a bad trade off, especially when you feel that future first will be a late first. I don’t think our 2021 pick will be a late first so honestly I don’t want to trade up unless we can get Fields or Wilson and we feel like they are our new healthy Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...