Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Definitely going against the grain here...


jdr6000

Recommended Posts

...but reading between the lines I get the feeling that Rhule thinks with a year of learning on the field under their belt, proper off-season prep, a much improved offensive line, and a healthy CMC in the backfield that Teddy and Brady can get the offense where they want it to go.  
 

I know this thread will get destroyed by the “you know who they are folks,” but at the end of the day I really think Rhule knows that with CMC injured all year and the offensive line being so bad, that they haven’t been able to do the things they planned on doing with Teddy this year.

So my all in push is that this offseason Rhule and Co hit the offensive line hard and do a few more defensive tweaks and use the summer to prepare everyone to get better together as a unit and give the offense a fair shake at it. 

I just think that Rhule seems to think more of Teddy’s abilities than many observers seem to, and thinks that once he gets in place the things he wants to (because this year he didn’t have CMC and nothing near the pass protection he wants for any QB), that Brady and Teddy will do what he believes they can do.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If CMC was healthy for the whole year and Teddy played a little bit better, panthers could have been 10-6, fairly easy. Could'uh should'uh would'uh tho...

I thought at max, this was a 3-13 team. In those loses 8 of them the panthers had a chance to take a late lead or tie. I think if was a normal season with OTAs, rookie camp, etc etc. We beat the raiders and win more of those close games. CMC would have helped the red zone, he had 6 TDs in 3 games. 

I look forward with Rhule, when I had huge questions about him withall the baylor/temple hires. Honestly the only position group that looked worse form 2019, was TEs. Each group lost talent, especially the DL and each group improved in 2020. Rhule also had the team ready for 60mins+ and made halftime adjustments. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bobcat91 said:

I listened to what Rhule said yesterday and honestly think he wants anyone but Teddy. Teddy is a caretaker to bridge between this year and when the new starter comes in. When his best comment was he started out strong, but..

I think he was real about the off-season for Teddy. I know in one game, they had a hot Mic and Rhule joked with Teddy about " You had one run and now youre tired" I dont think it was a joke anymore. Teddy needs PEDs and weight room time. He could get better and stronger. Rich Gannon did, Teddy could too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess part of my thinking is that I don’t think Matt is the kind of guy that would make things so obvious regarding the direction they will be taking in the draft. And yes part of his response could be a public smack talk to Teddy that he needs to get in the weight room and toughen up but that does not mean that he does not believe in his abilities to perform at the level that he wants Teddy to perform. Like I said I know that a lot of people on this forum are over and done with Teddy Bridgewater... but I am not so sure that the head coach of the team is. And at the end of the day I lean to the fact that he is not he thinks that he can do what he wants him to do once Coach has all the pieces in place.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stirs said:

I'm certainly not a Teddy fan but even objectively speakong Teddy has minimal, if any, trade value. If Carolina got anything notable, like beyond a 7th, for him I would be very surprised. Too much contract to be a backup, zero attractive ceiling for a team in search of a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I sensed a lot of frustration in his comments regarding his comments. I think the "Teddy needs to have a great off-season" stuff was because he's likely going to be competing with a top incoming rookie.

Maybe Teddy was Hurney's guy.  

Definitely feels like Rhule isn't as high on him.

I also thought it was interesting that Little and Grier were often inactive, could have been a bit of a power play between coach and GM.  Might want to draft his own QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, KSpan said:

I'm certainly not a Teddy fan but even objectively speakong Teddy has minimal, if any, trade value. If Carolina got anything notable, like beyond a 7th, for him I would be very surprised. Too much contract to be a backup, zero attractive ceiling for a team in search of a starter.

We eat Teddys bonus and they get the backup and tutor for their young QB

They eat Carsons bonus and get rid of the controversy and we get a starter

Just spitballin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Seven North Carolina players have entered the transfer portal or announced their intentions to enter so far today: Derek Dixon (6.5 PPG) Jonathan Powell (4.8 PPG) Kyan Evans (4.0 PPG) Zayden High (3.4 PPG) Isaiah Denis (1.9 PPG) Jaydon Young (1.8 PPG) James Brown (1.2 PPG)
    • As long as we have DB, odd man fronts are the way to go for us. We want to line DB up between the guard and tackle (4i-tech) because of how quick he is off the snap and his punch on the guard off the snap. If anyone is wondering why he pretty much has to be doubled (or combo blocked) just about every snap, its because he is lined up in that spot in our odd man front. If we change to an even front, it becomes a lot harder to have DB play the 4i-tech.  Not sure if I would say Evero likes smaller NTs - I wouldn't call Bobby Brown a small NT by any sense. I think we run a 1-tech NT, so they are usually getting double teamed (or combo blocked) by concept alone. I actually think Bobby Brown did a pretty good job of eating blocks and being positionally sound on most runs at him (not his fault we were rocking ass LBs last year + Wharton being god awful). The bigger problem came on the toss plays/outside runs where DB wasn't able to blow it up in the backfield (i.e., the Bills game). Lloyd should help with the run D and getting a rangy LB in the draft will definitely help. There are also some good 1-tech DTs (and 0-techs) that can be instant day 1 starters for us in the draft.
    • Thanks for bringing receipts. I appreciate the facts, but they are a stark contrast to what we see on the ice, but maybe, as I've said before, his "aw sh!t" moments just seem to weigh heavier than his "attaboy" moments.
×
×
  • Create New...