Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jonathan Jones thinks Deshaun to Carolina could happen.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I don’t understand the logic of those wanting to hold on to CMC if it means not getting Watson. 
 

Christian has another 4 years in his prime AT BEST. Probably not even that. We could have a pro bowl QB for the next ten years. It’s not even a debate, you give up CMC if it means getting Watson. 

People need to move on with the idea that RB is an important position in the modern NFL. It's not. You can find productive RBs in the mid rounds these days.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possible and probable are two different things. I think it is also 95% speculation at this point. 

Keep in mind he has to WANT to come here with a no-trade clause. Some of these bobbleheads are forgetting that.

Also, and I do realize that Houston has had a pretty rough history of trades under Bill O'Brien....but CMC isn't really that desirable of a trade asset with that contract being what it is. It's not awful but I don't think teams are really going to be scrambling to get him either.

TBH, our major trade asset is probably the guy none of us wants to see get traded. That being Brian Burns. He's an elite pass rusher with three years left on a rookie deal. If I am Houston, and the Panthers come calling....that's the guy I want in return.

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I don’t understand the logic of those wanting to hold on to CMC if it means not getting Watson. 
 

Christian has another 4 years in his prime AT BEST. Probably not even that. We could have a pro bowl QB for the next ten years. It’s not even a debate, you give up CMC if it means getting Watson. 

For all the talk about what a sh*tty GM Hurney was around these boards and how he was too loyal to RBs and overpaid RBs, you'd think they would get this, but they don't.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I don’t understand the logic of those wanting to hold on to CMC if it means not getting Watson. 
 

Christian has another 4 years in his prime AT BEST. Probably not even that. We could have a pro bowl QB for the next ten years. It’s not even a debate, you give up CMC if it means getting Watson. 

He plays rb, and wr. 4 years at best lol, yeah they was thinking that when they signed him.

Edited by BurnNChinn
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether we want to trade CMC or not, why would the Texans want to take on that contract?   Not that I don't think CMC is worth it, because I do, but the Texans are already in a terrible cap situation.  

Texans, if they trade Watson, are gonna want draft picks and young players on rookie deals.  At least if they play it smart.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

People need to move on with the idea that RB is an important position in the modern NFL. It's not. You can find productive RBs in the mid rounds these days.

The same people who think RB is more important than a pro bowl QB are the people who wanted to establish a winning culture by beating Washington the second last game of the year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...