Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jonathan Jones thinks Deshaun to Carolina could happen.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

In theory if we do trade CMC + for Watson then the + becomes a lot less.  Our 2nd rounder this year and next? 

I don't think Houston gets a 1st rounder if we trade CMC to them....heck it may be they ship back a 3rd rounder to us in such a deal.

We have to remember we are probably losing Samuel so it would be nice to be able to keep CMC to replace what Samuel did in the offense this past year.

I say go for it and trade some 1st rounders, some 2nd rounders, maybe throw Teddy in there if we can and maybe get a 3rd or 4th round pick in future drafts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, rmoneyg35 said:

Jones tweeted about us getting Watson for 2 first round picks and cmc.

 

you really think that’s all it would take to get him?

i doubt it. If that’s all then yes do it.

Jones actually tweeted polls about this for at least the Dolphins, probably other teams too (I think for the Dolphins, it was Tua plus 2 1st rounders).  I think he's gauging fan interest, not using any actual knowledge of what's being discussed between the teams. I think it's going to take more that that. At least another second, and very possibly another 1st, to get it done, unless the Texans management are complete morons. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Just playing devils advocate here but Ryan Tannehill had the same 33td to 7 ints that Watson did this past season and has more playoff wins.

I get that and understand where your coming from, but IMO its not a great comparison because of the fact that we've seen what Tannehill can do with a less than stellar roster in Miami, and at his peak there, 4200 yards, 27 tds, 12 INTS, thats a far stretch from the season that Watson just put out with a crappy roster in 4800 yds, 33 tds, 7 INT.  Tannehill had a good season, but without Henry as a threat, his playaction which made up a lot of his big pass plays, his stats would look dramatically different, and most likely look a lot like the seasons he had in Miami.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...