Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scenario: Poll inside.


Ivan The Awesome
 Share

Texans want one, who's going?  

120 members have voted

  1. 1. Texans want to deal Watson for a couple of firsts and one of these players, who's going to Houston?

    • Christian McCaffery
      70
    • D.J. Moore
      45
    • Brian Burns
      7


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Ooof. I would want to keep Chinn out of that deal but positional value does dictate you are right about that. I'd probably offer up Brown before I would Moore, though.

I like Moore more than Brown but Brown has more time on rookie deal.

Cap saved is cap I can spend to upgrade a different position. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AU-panther said:

I like Moore more than Brown but Brown has more time on rookie deal.

Cap saved is cap I can spend to upgrade a different position. 

 

True but Moore is also a much, much more valuable asset than Brown is at the moment. Especially for a team that is very WR needy.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I'd send CMC. They'd probably want Moore or Burns.

The reason I chose Moore is that he needs a new contract soon and it’s somewhere we can save money too. If we dealt McCaffrey we’d still eat a ton of that cap hit and then we’d definitely have to give Moore a huge contract or we’d have very few weapons for Watson...

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, t96 said:

The reason I chose Moore is that he needs a new contract soon and it’s somewhere we can save money too. If we dealt McCaffrey we’d still eat a ton of that cap hit and then we’d definitely have to give Moore a huge contract or we’d have very few weapons for Watson...

Yeah, the pre-June 1st cap hit would be pretty rough. But, then again they would be getting murdered in the cap hit too for trading Deshaun.

But getting rid of Moore would also immediately rob Watson of his biggest weapon.

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...