Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stafford Available


Untouchable
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, pantherj said:

If we trade Detriot our first for Stafford I'm done. I'm out.

That won't be happening...at least not this year's first.

I will say if we stand pat and don't trade or sign a FA QB and the QB we want isn't available at #8, I'd say trade back a little and draft Mac Jones.  We get maybe an extra 2nd rounder and a rookie QB who possibly could be a franchise QB.

This would be pushing all our chips onto the table, but Jones is getting drafted somewhere in the mid first round.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BurnNChinn said:

You really think they can win 8 games in a season with Teddy you are dumb

We will improve the roster, and with CMC playing at least most of the we'll be at or near 8 wins. What would you like to bet? We get near or at 8 wins and you change your avatar to an image that says "I don't know what I'm talking about"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AceBoogie said:

Signing Stafford is a backwards move for this team. Don’t compound a Teddy mistake with another over the hill QB that has never won anything in his life. 

Yeah he has always been on a crappy Lions team we would have CMC, Moore, Anderson to go with him. Better than trading the whole team for Watson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

In my opinion, I do not see them bringing in another big contract.  With Teddy, a rookie deal is manageable.  So if we were to take in Stafford, a move I think makes us an instant contender, we would have to renegotiate some contracts--mainly Stafford's.

When have the lions ever been contenders? Signing Stafford gets you better stats than Teddy and maybe two more wins. That’s about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Remains to be seen...

However, put Stafford behind a decent line w/our weapons and some upgrades on D and I like this team's chances to make some noise in the playoffs.

wow so you have no idea and want to stake the long-term success of our franchise on a hypothetical because you think we can get a couple seasons to "make some noise"

 

I'm convinced, let's dig into those high value spots were now afforded the luxury of taking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pantherj said:

We will improve the roster, and with CMC playing at least most of the we'll be at or near 8 wins. What would you like to bet? We get near or at 8 wins and you change your avatar to an image that says "I don't know what I'm talking about"

Oh now it’s get near 8 wins lol, already backing out I see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Growl said:

wow so you have no idea and want to stake the long-term success of our franchise on a hypothetical because you think we can get a couple seasons to "make some noise"

 

I'm convinced, let's dig into those high value spots were now afforded the luxury of taking

Why not we are not getting any of the good qbs this year look who all are getting them ahead of us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, spizike99x said:

Get Stafford and draft Kyle Pitts in the first instant boost to the offense. 

I'd focus on oline since Stafford isn't too mobile and in his mid 30s.

In this new age of QBing he could play into his late 30s early 40s if he wanted to probably. I don't think he's had catastrophic injuries has he? 

In any case he's probably alot better than Teddy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PJ's completion % was 63% when starting games in Carolina.  Which I believe is better than Bryce when starting.  And again, 4-3 as the starter here and the LONE QB Carolina has been able to actually win with in the Tepper era.  If you ask a gambling gunslinger to come into blowouts.....they are going to go down in a blaze of glory.  Which he would do.  Yeah, he isn't good.  And gunslingers are supposed to have rockier stats than checkdown QBs.   So....why does PJ Walker have a better comp % as a starter than Bryce Young.  And for every knock you want to make about PJ, you can find something or a skillset that PJ does better than Bryce.   I didn't say PJ had good field vision.  He doesn't.  Tell me about Bryce after he comes off the first read lol.  Let me repeat, PJ Walker is not a good QB.  He is NFL depth and an in house arm.  Bryce Young doesn't belong in a convo w/ Jake and Cam.  He belongs closer in a convo with the backup caliber QBs Carolina was forced into playing.  Which isn't just PJ Walker.  But Kyle Allen.  Moore.  Guys like that.   
    • Oh I see what you meant by memory. I will trust my memory, I have looked a a lot of those ball charts for Bryce and they trend a general pattern. They thing that has changed that I have noticed more recently is the reduction in the bunching of behind or at  the LOS passes over to his right.  Aside from the quantity of throws recently since the running game has become a more dominant factor. 
    • Yes but you basically said you are going from a quick skim of those charts without doing the same for Bryce and/or Andy. So you are going memory vs. snapshots. That's not going to be a very comprehensive analysis.
×
×
  • Create New...