Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stafford Available


Untouchable
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, pantherj said:

If we trade Detriot our first for Stafford I'm done. I'm out.

That won't be happening...at least not this year's first.

I will say if we stand pat and don't trade or sign a FA QB and the QB we want isn't available at #8, I'd say trade back a little and draft Mac Jones.  We get maybe an extra 2nd rounder and a rookie QB who possibly could be a franchise QB.

This would be pushing all our chips onto the table, but Jones is getting drafted somewhere in the mid first round.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BurnNChinn said:

You really think they can win 8 games in a season with Teddy you are dumb

We will improve the roster, and with CMC playing at least most of the we'll be at or near 8 wins. What would you like to bet? We get near or at 8 wins and you change your avatar to an image that says "I don't know what I'm talking about"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AceBoogie said:

Signing Stafford is a backwards move for this team. Don’t compound a Teddy mistake with another over the hill QB that has never won anything in his life. 

Yeah he has always been on a crappy Lions team we would have CMC, Moore, Anderson to go with him. Better than trading the whole team for Watson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

In my opinion, I do not see them bringing in another big contract.  With Teddy, a rookie deal is manageable.  So if we were to take in Stafford, a move I think makes us an instant contender, we would have to renegotiate some contracts--mainly Stafford's.

When have the lions ever been contenders? Signing Stafford gets you better stats than Teddy and maybe two more wins. That’s about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Remains to be seen...

However, put Stafford behind a decent line w/our weapons and some upgrades on D and I like this team's chances to make some noise in the playoffs.

wow so you have no idea and want to stake the long-term success of our franchise on a hypothetical because you think we can get a couple seasons to "make some noise"

 

I'm convinced, let's dig into those high value spots were now afforded the luxury of taking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pantherj said:

We will improve the roster, and with CMC playing at least most of the we'll be at or near 8 wins. What would you like to bet? We get near or at 8 wins and you change your avatar to an image that says "I don't know what I'm talking about"

Oh now it’s get near 8 wins lol, already backing out I see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Growl said:

wow so you have no idea and want to stake the long-term success of our franchise on a hypothetical because you think we can get a couple seasons to "make some noise"

 

I'm convinced, let's dig into those high value spots were now afforded the luxury of taking

Why not we are not getting any of the good qbs this year look who all are getting them ahead of us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, spizike99x said:

Get Stafford and draft Kyle Pitts in the first instant boost to the offense. 

I'd focus on oline since Stafford isn't too mobile and in his mid 30s.

In this new age of QBing he could play into his late 30s early 40s if he wanted to probably. I don't think he's had catastrophic injuries has he? 

In any case he's probably alot better than Teddy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...