Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stafford trade agreement might be in place before the Super Bowl

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted

If this team actually wanted Trubisky for anything other than a backup(even tho we have backups already) then lol this would clarify that the talent evaluation skills on this FO are shart and that TB signing wasnt' a fluke but the good draft was and then expect a trashcan draft.

Can't imagine we'd do that as I think this FO actually can evaluate talent

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Per Albert Breer...

But to who?

Well apparently, there have been talks with the Rams.

A Stafford-Goff swap maybe? 🤔

The Panthers should be al over Goff if he comes available. I don’t understand why LA wants to get rid of him. Every time I’ve seen Goff play I’ve come away impressed. Am I missing something with him?

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, FakePlasticTrees said:

If we sign Trubisky then I will have to turn in my Panthers fan badge.  I said signing Bridgewater last year was a huge mistake. Please do not double down on these flier deals on QBs that are, at best, back-ups.

Mitch has MUCH more talent than Teddy B. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
USDepartmentOfSavagery Grand Master

USDepartmentOfSavagery

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Pup McBarky said:

I'm fine with this. Trubisky's issue is he played for a college coach who didn't teach poo. Then he played for a pro coach who didn't teach poo. If he's open to learning, our coaches, who Rhule insists on being teachers first, could turn into something. He's got talent, he needs a good teacher.

Of course, I'm okay as long as the price is right...i.e. cheap.

Must be a UNC fan. He’s straight trash. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

If this team actually wanted Trubisky for anything other than a backup(even tho we have backups already) then lol this would clarify that the talent evaluation skills on this FO are shart and that TB signing wasnt' a fluke but the good draft was and then expect a trashcan draft.

Can't imagine we'd do that as I think this FO actually can evaluate talent

Because you know more than them, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, joemac said:

The Panthers should be al over Goff if he comes available. I don’t understand why LA wants to get rid of him. Every time I’ve seen Goff play I’ve come away impressed. Am I missing something with him?

Yeah Goff is fuggin terrible and has a really bad contract.  He sucks too if I didnt mention that.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, FakePlasticTrees said:

If we sign Trubisky then I will have to turn in my Panthers fan badge.  I said signing Bridgewater last year was a huge mistake. Please do not double down on these flier deals on QBs that are, at best, back-ups.

That tweet comes from the same bullsh-t site that posted Joe Brady was leaving.

It was posted as a joke in response to someone saying they liked Twitter sources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Looked up an old friend of ours.

The second tweet was written in response to Jeremy Fowler's mention of the Rams as a possible Matthew Stafford destination.

So yes, the Rams are talking about trading Goff. And yeah, given that the Lions GM is one of the guys who chose Goff in the first place, it's a very plausible option.

Will it happen? No idea. If it does, it'll be complicated as hell.

But it's being explored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

PFT points out that the Rams don't have a first round pick to offer.

Makes me think they'd have to give the Lions something else of value.

Like maybe...I dunno...

Giants-Rams-Football-2-1.jpg?w=525

 

I think you've posted this picture by mistake. You said something of value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted

I still think that Stafford will end up in Indianapolis. It just fits their current plans. They are built for the now, they just need a good QB and for the ball to land the right way a few times.  Rivers was close, but maybe not enough tread left on the tires... Stafford could hit the sweet spot for what they want.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Seltzer
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Seltzer · Posted

      Regardless of how we got here, any rational fan should be excited by how well Bryce played down the stretch. Anyone not happy about that level of play either doesn't know what they're looking at, or they're still trying to drive tired narratives. Obviously, Cam had an all-time rookie season, and I'm not putting the two in the same basket yet, but as someone who has watched every snap of Panthers football since the start of the new millennium (Im old), Bryce was playing at a higher level at the end of 2024 than Cam was at the end of 2012 (his 2nd season). Cam continued to develop into MVP form, something Bryce has to prove, but as someone who watched both (and will stan for Cam always), Bryce was playing at a higher level to end year 2 than Cam did.  Go watch the film if you dont believe me. None of that means anything for the future. But the people who said BY9 couldnt play in this league are wrong.   That being said, the only thing that matters is this year. #20 is perfectly fair IMO going into the season. I mean think about it, how would you rank him??!  His in-season turnaround is one of the wildest things I've ever seen... how do you rank a guy who looked like a massive bust in September and by January was consistently playing at a top 10 level? My excitement level is pretty damn high heading into this season. There were throws from the Chiefs game onward where Bryce had Drew Brees levels of anticipation. Im excited to see what he can do with a full deck on offense, something we really never gave Cam. Really hope and expect Bryce to move up this list this season.  
    • tukafan21
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Not really, the only QB's (other than Anthony Richardson) ranked below him are new to their teams as a placeholder starter or drafted in 2024 or 2025, not a lot of gymnastics to get there. It's not about how many that is, if it's 20, 12, or 2... It means there isn't a QB who's team has committed to them for the long term right now that they have ranked below Bryce. That's not a great thing.
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      The changes to onside kicks were ridiculous and ruined a significant part of the game     It was already a high risk low reward play.  Why change it?
×
×
  • Create New...