Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My final offer for Deshaun


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Riverboat Ron said:

Meh, I'd rather draft pieces for a future QB than sell the farm for one guy who could easily get Cam Newton'd. 

The last regime failed Cam. Should have won a Super Bowl here. You don’t make deals thinking you can’t effectively build plans around them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Santee_Panther said:

I think they'd have to also take Teddy for me to be ok with this. 

Why? Just cut him and let him find another tram. I think if he’s cut at a certain point of the offseason he’d be an $8 million cap hit instead of $23 million. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

I think only $8-10 million instead of all $23. Maybe I’m wrong.

 

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/carolina-panthers/teddy-bridgewater-14441/

I am on my cell, and couldn’t tell from OTC, but thought it was higher. my apologies. But spotrac is showing $10mil guaranteed in 21.

Don’t forget we would get hit with $10mil prorated signing bonus too, so $23 mil cap hit with a $20 mil dead cap, so only a $3mil savings to cut him. 

But if we traded him, only $10mil dead for a $13 mil savings (the new team would take on the guaranteed salary).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have got to give to get whether we like it or not.

I still don't think it's going to happen, we will either get a QB we like at #8 because our draft intel will be good enough to know what is going to happen 1-7, we may trade up if we feel like we can get a QB we really like, or if we just can't get what we want at #8 we'll trade back a little and get an extra later round first and maybe a 2nd if we deal well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Rocky Davis said:

You have got to give to get whether we like it or not.

I still don't think it's going to happen, we will either get a QB we like at #8 because our draft intel will be good enough to know what is going to happen 1-7, we may trade up if we feel like we can get a QB we really like, or if we just can't get what we want at #8 we'll trade back a little and get an extra later round first and maybe a 2nd if we deal well.

I don’t see how QBs don’t go 1-3 in this draft. The Jets and Dolphins would be stupid not to get the bounty of picks that will be thrown at them if they pass on QBs.  Lawrence, Fields and Wilson will all be gone quickly.  If the Panthers stay at 8 it’s Lance (who also may be gone) or Mac Jones.  If you want one of these guys Rhule has to be aggressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw the list, agree Minshew would be on the list of possible guys as well as the rest of the list.  Mac Jones would probably be the highest possible target though that would require a trade. All that said, heres a darkhorse that I wouldnt be surprised...Carson Wentz.  I know he looked rough his last time out, however he was clearly pretty dangerously injured and kept playing through it.  When he was healthy in Minnesota he looked pretty fricken good.  Last full season he started he threw for 3500, 27td, 7 INT.  He did start the next season for a washington team running a scheme that does not fit him.  I think the things that Canales is looking for his QB to do, that Wentz does well.   Wentz however with his age would not be any kind of long term solution, a decent backup but more like actual competition would be needed to go into the season.  
    • This reads as someone trying to suggest changes while treading lightly so Daddy Tepper doesn’t come down too hard on them.  Because flatly, the problem is Bryce.  I don’t think Canales is a perfect coach, but you can see the limitations in what can be called, what is called, and the amount of times Bryce fugs up plays all by himself.  Someone brought up the bootlegs being useless because there is always a free defender rushing - think about how different that play looks with a 6’2”+ QB with a strong arm and mobility.  I can’t count the number of times Bryce has thrown and missed bc he can’t see, it gets deflected, he chucks it away, or his patented run and fumble just on bootlegs and roll outs.  By percentage of those plays per player I have ever watched, Bryce has more negative plays WITHOUT A fuging DOUBT than anyone I have ever watched before.  Like an uncanny ability to fug up the simplest of things.  I have never seen anything like it.  And then, as I mentioned in the other thread, when you string those seemingly one-off plays together, and those stack over the course of a game, poo looks really disjointed.  It is Bryce.  Enough of this nebulous ass “something’s afoot!” bullshit.
×
×
  • Create New...