Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bucs may have had a bounty like system


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Much ado about nothing IMO. Florio is really good at that.

 

He is, and it could be. I do think it's newsworthy but I'm not necessarily inclined to make much of it right now.

Course, some of us also said that when the Saints news first broke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jesse said:

Not as nearly much as my colleagues in other states

I literally don't care what the number is, nor if you make it up. I will make up the number of $50,000 for the sake of this exercise.

I was just going to illustrate that if they had a thousand dollar wager on each game this season(19 total including the Super Bowl), that is $19,000 over the course of this past season. Devin White made $1,827,537 in salary in 2020(not including the bonus he was paid in 2019). If he lost every week, that would be roughly 1% of his income. LeVonte David made $10,750,000 in salary in 2020. If he lost every week that would roughly be 0.17% of his income.

For perspective, 1% of $50,000 is $500. Divided over 19 weeks, this would equal $26.32 per week in wagering. 0.17% of $50,000 is $85. Divided over 19 weeks, this would equal $4.47 per week in wagering.

So.....how is this an example of them going broke???

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I literally don't care what the number is, nor if you make it up. I will make up the number of $50,000 for the sake of this exercise.

I was just going to illustrate that if they had a thousand dollar wager on each game this season(19 total including the Super Bowl), that is $19,000 over the course of this past season. Devin White made $1,827,537 in salary in 2020(not including the bonus he was paid in 2019). If he lost every week, that would be roughly 1% of his income. LeVonte David made $10,750,000 in salary in 2020. If he lost every week that would roughly be 0.17% of his income.

For perspective, 1% of $50,000 is $500. Divided over 19 weeks, this would equal $26.32 per week in wagering. 0.17% of $50,000 is $85. Divided over 19 weeks, this would equal $4.47 per week in wagering.

So.....how is this an example of them going broke???

 

There is a place I go and do work for in South Carolina.  It's a manufacturing plant.  A guy there has been running a NFL pool there for at least as long as I have been going there.  So 12 years.  Maybe longer.  The stakes have always remained the same.  $20 to get in and the winner gets the whole pot.  It only runs during the regular season, so 17 weeks and these guys don't make $50,000 a year.  I won't say much less, but less.  The pool has had anywhere from 30 to 50 people in it at one time or another and the winner takes the whole pot each week.  

The point is, it's not just NFL players that do this kind of stuff every week it's all kind of people and none of them are going broke from it. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bababoey said:

There is a place I go and do work for in South Carolina.  It's a manufacturing plant.  A guy there has been running a NFL pool there for at least as long as I have been going there.  So 12 years.  Maybe longer.  The stakes have always remained the same.  $20 to get in and the winner gets the whole pot.  It only runs during the regular season, so 17 weeks and these guys don't make $50,000 a year.  I won't say much less, but less.  The pool has had anywhere from 30 to 50 people in it at one time or another and the winner takes the whole pot each week.  

The point is, it's not just NFL players that do this kind of stuff every week it's all kind of people and none of them are going broke from it. 

That is just an example of someone seeing $1000 a week and valuing it in "regular people money" not "getting paid millions" money. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I literally don't care what the number is, nor if you make it up. I will make up the number of $50,000 for the sake of this exercise.

I was just going to illustrate that if they had a thousand dollar wager on each game this season(19 total including the Super Bowl), that is $19,000 over the course of this past season. Devin White made $1,827,537 in salary in 2020(not including the bonus he was paid in 2019). If he lost every week, that would be roughly 1% of his income. LeVonte David made $10,750,000 in salary in 2020. If he lost every week that would roughly be 0.17% of his income.

For perspective, 1% of $50,000 is $500. Divided over 19 weeks, this would equal $26.32 per week in wagering. 0.17% of $50,000 is $85. Divided over 19 weeks, this would equal $4.47 per week in wagering.

So.....how is this an example of them going broke???

 

It doesn’t matter what the percentage of their pre-tax paycheck is. It’s about the lack of financial literacy and lack of planning for many athletes. I didn’t necessarily imply the two jabronis from Tampa, but athletes as a whole. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...