Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

La Canfora on Tepper's desire for Watson/franchise QB


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

All the owners have F.U. money, but, at the end of the day, they all fold in these situations. It's only a matter of how long. Keeping a disgruntled QB isn't in their best interest. Anyone that doesn't understand this is naive!

And Tepper has the most of all (and it's not even close), right?

Caserio can ignore Fitts, but Cal will take Tepper's calls if it comes to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

What if he sits out?

What if he's tearing the locker room apart. Undermining the staff and front office?

At some point, a situation gets to the point of toxicity that the trade haul you're going to get greatly outweighs trying to keep him.

1.  Watson doesn't get paid.

2.  He gets suspended for improper conduct and doesn't get paid.

3.  The McNair family, worth ~$4b/$5B, just might prefer to teach Deshaun Watson a hard lesson -- DW needs them to get rich, they don't need DW at all.

As they say, never pay ransom to a kidnapper...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SizzleBuzz said:

1.  Watson doesn't get paid.

2.  He gets suspended for improper conduct and doesn't get paid.

3.  The McNair family, worth ~$4b/$5B, just might prefer to teach Deshaun Watson a hard lesson -- DW needs them to get rich, they don't need DW at all.

As they say, never pay ransom to a kidnapper...

You can hardly contain yourself with the erotic thoughts of an old moneyed white man "teaching a lesson" to a young talented black man stepping out of line.

Maybe they are dumb enough to cut off their own nose to spite their face but they'll have to tank their organization to do it and Watson will still end up eventually playing elsewhere 

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

All the owners have F.U. money, but, at the end of the day, they all fold in these situations. It's only a matter of how long. Keeping a disgruntled QB isn't in their best interest. Anyone that doesn't understand this is naive!

Yeah, you'd have to be a special kind of stupid to just torpedo your franchise intentionally like that. Not trade him basically means a spot in the cellar of the NFL and with little draft capital this year to help them climb out of it. Their best hope is tanking in 2021(while will likely happen anyway) and even then they still won't get the embarrassment of riches in the draft to enable them to quickly turn their situation around.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My take:

This happening would either be the best thing ever for this franchise, or the worst thing ever for this franchise. No in between. 

I don't know if we have the roster built up enough to offer what we would need to land Watson and be competitive. It very well could end up like a Saints situation with Breese 7 or so years ago, stuck in perpetual 7-9 mediocrity with no draft picks to make the team better.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You can hardly contain yourself with the erotic thoughts of an old moneyed white man "teaching a lesson" to a young talented black man stepping out of line.

Maybe they are dumb enough to cut off their own nose to spite their face but they'll have to tank their organization to do it and Watson will still end up eventually playing elsewhere 

This dude really is about as transparent as they come. His post history is insane. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You can hardly contain yourself with the erotic thoughts of an old moneyed white man "teaching a lesson" to a young talented black man stepping out of line.

Maybe they are dumb enough to cut off their own nose to spite their face but they'll have to tank their organization to do it and Watson will still end up eventually playing elsewhere 

Well, you said it for me... probably a little more colorfully at that!

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not a big Darnold fan, but I'd still rate him significantly better than Bridgewater.

He at least has a chance to make a turn around like Ryan Tannehill did. Don't know that he will, but I do feel pretty comfortable saying that Bridgewater won't.

I think Darnold, in the right situation, could be really good. Similar to Goff with the Rams. His first year with Fisher was trash, put him with McVay he went off for a year or two. Granted, he fell back off, but coaching matters. That’s why I said, in regards to Teddy and Darnold, “as of now” bc now it’s kind of a wash until Darnold goes to the right situation. Houston wouldn’t be that right situation so you’d probably get the same results if Teddy went there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teddy + CMC + picks will make sense for the Texans. They have no QBs. They have no stars to sell to fans. They have no 1st or 2nd rounders this year. They will be the worst team in the league next year and will have the #1 pick in 2022. They will be the worst team in their division for years to come.

CMC + next year's #1 (Howell/Rattler/someone) next year puts them in at least an upward trajectory. Adding whatever additional picks they'd get from Carolina would be a luxury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, top dawg said:

All the owners have F.U. money, but, at the end of the day, they all fold in these situations.

Keeping a disgruntled QB isn't in their best interest.

Anyone that doesn't understand this is naive!

Steelers called LeVeon Bell's bluff -- twice!

Au contraire!  It's always best to keep your "franchise QB" within the fold.

The definition of naivete is failing to consider all the possible outcomes...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

1.  Watson doesn't get paid.

2.  He gets suspended for improper conduct and doesn't get paid.

3.  The McNair family, worth ~$4b/$5B, just might prefer to teach Deshaun Watson a hard lesson -- DW needs them to get rich, they don't need DW at all.

As they say, never pay ransom to a kidnapper...

Watson is already rich

Houston does have needs.  Imagine trying to fill a stadium after covid....and you traded Nuk, JJ walks away and Watson sits.  A place no FA wants to go at the moment.  Then imagine being an ego maniac....and  entire nation is talking about the joke FO/owner situation they created?  Entire city, league, and NFL world laughing and pointing at the joke.   They might have money.  But the folks in Houston got egos.   Those got wants.  Those folks aren't content w/ having some money.   They got a league and nation watching them. 

the NBA mentality is coming to the NFL.   Only a matter of time.  Unavoidable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Depends on the price. An elite pass rusher on a rookie contract is worth a LOT. I'll wager we could peddle him for much more than a first round draft pick at the moment. So if they want Burns, one of those firsts is off the table, IMO. He's worth more than a first. 

Reasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Depends on the price. An elite pass rusher on a rookie contract is worth a LOT. I'll wager we could peddle him for much more than a first round draft pick at the moment. So if they want Burns, one of those firsts is off the table, IMO. He's worth more than a first. 

I think Burns is one of best assets of any team out there that might be interested in Watson.

People need to remember that all 1st aren’t created equal.  

Jets 1st is worth a lot more than our 1st, but our first is worth more than the first of someone like the WFT.

Burns might get two mid round first on the open market but he wouldn’t get you the #2 overall pick.

Jets and Dolphins have better picks to offer, we probably have better young players.

Honestly I can’t see a team like the 49ers or WFT out bidding us. 

 

Edited by AU-panther
Add
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

My take:

This happening would either be the best thing ever for this franchise, or the worst thing ever for this franchise. No in between. 

I don't know if we have the roster built up enough to offer what we would need to land Watson and be competitive. It very well could end up like a Saints situation with Breese 7 or so years ago, stuck in perpetual 7-9 mediocrity with no draft picks to make the team better.

Worth remembering that Watson himself has said he doesn't want to go to a team that has to mortgage their future to get him.

Naturally, what complicates that is that most trade scenarios have the Texans asking potential trade partners to mortgage their future.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...