Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers will "pay any price" for Watson (via Sportsnaut via PFN)


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I definitely believe McNair's ego is heavily involved here.

Caserio's might be too. He likely doesn't want his reputation to hinge on him being the guy that traded away Deshaun Watson.

That's actually part of why I think he won't be traded.

Caserio should just make the phone call up the road to Raphael Stone, the fresh new GM of the Rockets--aka the guy who traded James Harden. At least Caserio didn't get the "who"? response when he got his job, unlike Stone. He already has a rep as a Patriots person. Already ahead of Stone.

He should ask Stone how the Rockets' owner's ego probably had a role in them getting less for Harden than they initially said. Texans said, "3 1sts to start" for Watson. Rockets said "4+ FRPs, plus player + plus a young all-star to build around". Not quite what they got at all. And Harden went where he wanted in the first place and the narrative on him quickly changed. Watson is gone--they're just delaying the inevitable.

Is this the NBA-ization of the NFL? Yep. Some seem to think that Cal will hold out because the owners need him to in order to stop this. 1. He can't stop this, and 2. he owes the owners nothing. Cal will remember that his late father had to overoffer the expansion fee for the Texans in the first place, since the league was so determined to give LA a team and basically ignored the Houston bid. The elder McNair had to blow the offering process up by paying $700m--hundreds of millions more than LA had--for the team...in the 1990s.

If the owners want Cal to do their bidding, he may as well extract a Super Bowl for Houston every other year over the next 20.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CRA said:

We don't know how he always arrived at "his terms".  

You think the "Patriot way" involved Bill having highly paid leaders of the franchise sitting out and trashing him? 

They were winning. Nobody had nay leverage.

The Texans have no such leverage, but that doesn't necessarily stop them from acting like they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BrisbanePanther said:

Caserio should just make the phone call up the road to Raphael Stone, the fresh new GM of the Rockets--aka the guy who traded James Harden. At least Caserio didn't get the "who"? response when he got his job, unlike Stone. He already has a rep as a Patriots person. Already ahead of Stone.

He should ask Stone how the Rockets' owner's ego probably had a role in them getting less for Harden than they initially said. Texans said, "3 1sts to start" for Watson. Rockets said "4+ FRPs, plus player + plus a young all-star to build around". Not quite what they got at all. And Harden went where he wanted in the first place and the narrative on him quickly changed. Watson is gone--they're just delaying the inevitable.

Is this the NBA-ization of the NFL? Yep. Some seem to think that Cal will hold out because the owners need him to in order to stop this. 1. He can't stop this, and 2. he owes the owners nothing. Cal will remember that his late father had to overoffer the expansion fee for the Texans in the first place, since the league was so determined to give LA a team and basically ignored the Houston bid. The elder McNair had to blow the offering process up by paying $700m--hundreds of millions more than LA had--for the team...in the 1990s.

If the owners want Cal to do their bidding, he may as well extract a Super Bowl for Houston every other year over the next 20.

"What the Texans should do" and "What the Texans will do" are two separate lists that probably don't have much of anything in the way of common items between them.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

They were winning. Nobody had nay leverage.

The Texans have no such leverage, but that doesn't necessarily stop them from acting like they do.

not a lot of info gets out of NE.  But we know it isn't exactly a happy place. 

and a lot of bodies have left NE.  Big names.  Probably no team has parted with more big names to watch them play elsewhere.  I seriously doubt that was always a one way street dictated only by Bill. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

On his terms though, not theirs.

Yeah, but Caserio is not Belichick.  I think we've learned over the years that simply working with BB, and being around BB cannot turn a guy into BB.  There is no gaining of knowledge or insight or instinct via osmosis.  How many Pats coaches and front office guys have gone on to great success in the NFL?  How many have been hired and failed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

Great negotiating strategy to get a deal. We will pay anything. Name your price.  

Crazy if you aren't priceline.

Hell, it probably was Houston.  In hopes Tepper would come out and squash it.  Try to take some hope away from Watson.   See, Deshaun, everyone isn't going to bend over backwards to try to get you. 

who knows, as rich as Tepper is....I don't put that narrative out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

not a lot of info gets out of NE.  But we know it isn't exactly a happy place. 

and a lot of bodies have left NE.  Big names.  Probably not team has parted with more big names to watch them play elsewhere.  I seriously doubt that was always a one way street dictated only by Bill. 

I think there's probably a fair amount of crossover between "The Patriot Way" and "Stockholm Syndrome".

Looks like it might start falling apart with Brady gone though.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, joemac said:

Yeah, but Caserio is not Belichick.  I think we've learned over the years that simply working with BB, and being around BB cannot turn a guy into BB.  There is no gaining of knowledge or insight or instinct via osmosis.  How many Pats coaches and front office guys have gone on to great success in the NFL?  How many have been hired and failed?

You still have to account for McNair though.

For all we know, Caserio might have a perfectly reasonable take on things. But if McNair doesn't, here we stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You can't say that with any certainty at all. Bryce played the worst football of any rookie ever. His mechanics and footwork have nothing to do with Frank, DC or anyone else. All those ints and fumbles, yep, those are Bryce too.  Bryce and Stroud are 2 different QBs. Just because Bryce had one complete game in year 3 vs Atlanta doesnt mean he could have led a team to the playoffs his rookie year. 
    • I added a question mark to your question. Also bolded it to look prettier.  
    • I don't understand the tone, I gave you my ranking, that's it.  And yes, I still view Lawrence and Kyler are still ahead, in my opinion, which doesn't really mean much lol.  What's this have to do with being a fan ffs? I will say, they are at the end of the list/the more arguable/debatable guys.  So open to debate but it seems you're going straight to the "you're not a fan" debate.  Which is super annoying. Maybe I'd agree Bryce could be ~19-20 on the list if the argument was laid out instead.  His Atlanta game was better than anything they have done in recent memory, but he's had like 10 other games this season.   He is way more inconsistent in my view, due to a few factors... Shotty footwork - he has a shallow lazy step back from gun that puts an OL in an impossible place.  Goes on his toes wayyy to much more my liking. Poor upper body mechanics.  His upper body remains parallel to the LOS and has to perform that rapid twitch/turn motion to get in stance His shallow drops also create a lack of sight lines so he can't layer throws well He's had poor pocket presence - not last week, but it's been a thing   Pure traits standpoint Arm strength is mediocre Mobility is mediocre - can outrun at times but quicker IDLs can catch him Accuracy is a range due to his inconsistency - can be above average to very poor.  His career so far has been pretty bad with intermediates (which again was not the case against ATL) Ball Security Way too sensitive to fumbling Has exhibited very poor decision making, especially in first halves that put the team behind This all does NOT take away that he had a GREAT performance against ATL.  He was able to extend plays, found guys post-route in stride, the XL throw in Q3 was fantastic, a few of the Coker crossers were beauts.  There's no disputing that.   But yeah, in totality, it hasn't looked good but he absolutely cooked last week. Outside of that, he's only had 5 other 250 yard passing games in his entire career.  He stalls on drives, makes annoying turnovers, doesn't see the right guys.  It's okay to both say that and the fact that he balled tf out last week.  I hope he continues so we get better and maybe can make some noise.  Big test on Monday.  
×
×
  • Create New...