Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: 49ers called Panthers about Teddy Bridgewater


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

How else do you respond to a dumb post?

Amusing coming from a person making posts that are astronomically dumber. Like thinking Teddy is a franchise QB. Ignoring facts and stats and denying things that you can google and see actually happened, like the Stafford trade attempt.

You are like that knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail. You have your arm chopped off and deny that it is and it is just a flesh wound. I feel sorry for any fanbase your precious Teddy goes to because they will have to deal with god awful fans like you. 

Edited by TLGPanthersFan
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Amusing coming from a person making posts that are astronomically dumber. Like thinking Teddy is a franchise QB. Ignoring facts and stats and denying things that you can google and see actually happened, like the Stafford trade attempt.

You are like that knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail. You have your arm chopped off and deny that it is and it is just a flesh wound. I feel sorry for any fanbase your precious Teddy goes to because they will have to deal with god awful fans like you. 

So you saw the Safford trade attempt? You can help you mob brothers out by posting a link showing that a member of the Panthers organization has confirmed that they offered to trade for him. Nobody else seems to be able to do it. All they can say is that everybody in the mob knows that it happened.

What exactly is a franchise quarterback? Was Cam a franchise quarterback? How about Goff. What is the attraction to being a franchise quarterback if you can be taken out with the trash at the pleasure of the franchise that you're the quarterback of?  Maybe idolizing the franchise quarterback is just mob think. You know, like kneeling before the King. You should try to think about that. 

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

So you saw the Safford trade attempt? You can help you mob brothers out by posting a link showing that a member of the Panthers organization has confirmed that they offered to trade for him. Nobody else seems to be able to do it. All they can say is that everybody in the mob knows that it happened.

What exactly is a franchise quarterback? Was Cam a franchise quarterback? How about Goff. What is the attraction to being a franchise quarterback if you can be taken out with the trash at the pleasure of the franchise that you're the quarterback of?  Maybe idolizing the franchise quarterback is just mob think. You know, like kneeling before the King. You should try to think about that. 

Cam Newton is a franchise great, won an MVP, and made a Super Bowl. Don’t drag his name near Teddy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does this guy like Teddy so much? Does the Huddle over exaggerate how bad Teddy is? Yes, of course. Should fans be satisfied with Teddy as their starting QB? No, of course not. He is a good backup who can step in and win some games by playing it safe. Our Owner, GM, and Head Coach have all hinted at upgrading our QB position.

I’ll be the first to admit I thought he had potential in Joe Brady’s offense with our weapons last year before the season started and several games in. I saw enough to know he isn’t the answer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Why does this guy like Teddy so much? Does the Huddle over exaggerate how bad Teddy is? Yes, of course. Should fans be satisfied with Teddy as their starting QB? No, of course not. He is a good backup who can step in and win some games by playing it safe. Our Owner, GM, and Head Coach have all hinted at upgrading our QB position.

I’ll be the first to admit I thought he had potential in Joe Brady’s offense with our weapons last year before the season started and several games in. I saw enough to know he isn’t the answer...

Exaggeration is an euphemism for lying. If Teddy's so bad, what's the need for all of that? Football, and the NFL in particular is purported to be a meritocracy. If, and when a better option at quarterback comes along, the Panthers will replace him. Everyone understands that, especially Teddy, since he has been in both camps.  

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Exaggeration is an euphemism for lying. If Teddy's so bad, what's the need for all of that? Football, and the NFL in particular is purported to be a meritocracy. If, and when a better option at quarterback comes along, the Panthers will replace him. Everyone understands that, especially Teddy, since he has been in both camps.  

Exaggeration is something most sports fans do. How many “once in a generation” prospects have you heard about in your life.   It gets amplified for the QB position like everything else. The staff has spoken pretty clearly about Teddy and I don’t see us coming back from that. Teddy was a risky FA that looked solid in a limited window with a ton of talent around him in NO. We gambled (a little) on him and it didn’t work out. There is a reason teams are not blowing up our phones to trade for him. The Niners are “interested” because there starter always gets hurt and they want a solid backup for insurance. I personally wouldn’t mind him starting while we groomed a Fields or Lance, but I don’t know if that’s possible anymore.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

You can help you mob brothers out by posting a link showing that a member of the Panthers organization has confirmed that they offered to trade for him. 

That's already been done earlier in the thread (specifically, Darin Gantt confirming the Stafford trade offer).

And to be clear, denying what's been shown to you plainly isn't funny, interesting or effective. It shows you've got nothing to offer.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's already been done earlier in the thread (specifically, Darin Gantt confirming the Stafford trade offer).

And to be clear, denying what's been shown to you plainly isn't funny, interesting or effective. It shows you've got nothing to offer.

It’s like him and Fizzlefuzz are the same people.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Exaggeration is something most sports fans do. How many “once in a generation” prospects have you heard about in your life.   It gets amplified for the QB position like everything else. The staff has spoken pretty clearly about Teddy and I don’t see us coming back from that. Teddy was a risky FA that looked solid in a limited window with a ton of talent around him in NO. We gambled (a little) on him and it didn’t work out. There is a reason teams are not blowing up our phones to trade for him. The Niners are “interested” because there starter always gets hurt and they want a solid backup for insurance. I personally wouldn’t mind him starting while we groomed a Fields or Lance, but I don’t know if that’s possible anymore.

There's a difference in exaggeration and being wrong. This place is the perfect example. Panther fans are wrong about Teddy Bridgewater not being a starting caliber quarterback, but they are flat out lying about him being offered to the Lions.

Who is this staff that has spoken so clearly about Teddy. What exactly did they say, and what is it that you can't come back from. You're killing me with the vagueness and innuendo.

The problem with a lot of sports fans is that they're playing with monopoly money where they can take a "little" twenty million dollar gamble and then get a do over because "it didn't work out" . An  then some other team in "interested" in a twenty million dollar back up.

Hanging out in a mob is easy living. No thinking required. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

There's a difference in exaggeration and being wrong. This place is the perfect example. Panther fans are wrong about Teddy Bridgewater not being a starting caliber quarterback, but they are flat out lying about him being offered to the Lions.

Who is this staff that has spoken so clearly about Teddy. What exactly did they say, and what is it that you can't come back from. You're killing me with the vagueness and innuendo.

The problem with a lot of sports fans is that they're playing with monopoly money where they can take a "little" twenty million dollar gamble and then get a do over because "it didn't work out" . An  then some other team in "interested" in a twenty million dollar back up.

Hanging out in a mob is easy living. No thinking required. 

No lies and he will be gone. Damn worded it wrong Teddy u will gone, u will not be a Panther this year! That better for you?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...