Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris Simms “no way the panthers draft Lance at 8”


GoobyPls
 Share

Recommended Posts

 Cannt run the offense??? RPO??? I now question if he truly watched the panthers or lance at all. CHris knows more than I, but that doesnt mean hes never wrong about a player. Chris isnt aware that ND runs a pro system, unless most of college teams....and not a good a fit for the panthers LSU/Saints system??? Chris found crack during convid. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, that was posted earlier too. So why do you think he isn't running?

If he went out there and ran like the wind it would definitely help him.

And if he doesn’t then people will use it against him. There isn’t a reason for him to run it. How many times in a NFL game will a QB run in a straight line? Unless you know you’re like a 4.4 guy, if I’m a QB I’m not running it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AceBoogie said:

Gotta get out of this type of thinking. A QB doesn’t need to start week 1. 

Odd, I thought you had to start a QB in every game.  You take him in the top 10 he starts.  If he is not going to be ready in his first year you don't take him in the first period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

And if he doesn’t then people will use it against him. There isn’t a reason for him to run it. How many times in a NFL game will a QB run in a straight line? Unless you know you’re like a 4.4 guy, if I’m a QB I’m not running it. 

Running is a big part of his game and there are serious questions about his level of competition. If he could run fast it would definitely help him. My point is that I don't think he can.

You think Lamar Jackson lasts until #32 if he had gone out there and ran sub-4.4 like he's probably capable? Now I get why he chose not to run. Some teams were talking possible position change with him and he was adamant about staying at QB. But no one is talking position change with Lance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Running is a big part of his game and there are serious questions about his level of competition. If he could run fast it would definitely help him. My point is that I don't think he can.

He has been clocked at 20 mph during live games a couple of times. Level of competition does not affect his on field speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

And if he doesn’t then people will use it against him. There isn’t a reason for him to run it. How many times in a NFL game will a QB run in a straight line? Unless you know you’re like a 4.4 guy, if I’m a QB I’m not running it. 

The only reason I can think for NOT running is a team gave him/agent a guarantee selection.... got to be early too. Part request too.

21+ MPH in pads, thats legit NFL speed no matter the position. Id still run and its still sus about him not trying to improve his draft stock aka millions. He could have gotten injured while working out too, just adds to the mystery. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...