Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trey Lance - best QB of this draft not named Lawrence


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, NAS said:

Well his tape ain’t bad either

What little there is of it.  I wouldn't want my job riding on picking one of these guys to succeed.  I just don't see what others see in these guys beyond Trevor.  Even he has an uphill battle where he's going.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

“But when you talk to the folks at North Dakota State, this kid is incredibly intelligent. He can direct fronts, he can do all the stuff at the line of scrimmage you need to do. He's a fantastic athlete and runner [and] he’s got a power arm.” 

 

https://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/49ers/2021-nfl-draft-trey-lance-ready-compete-starting-role-rookie

This is why I am glad we had the head coach and GM there.  Rhule values the cerebral players--players who can adapt to multiple positions, players that do not make mental mistakes.  At the SR Bowl, he praised Jones for his processing.  So if they leave NDSU with these questions answered, he could be the player we move up to grab.  I wish he had more experience.  The same people saying (about Jones) "Yeah, but he had a great team around him." should be saying that with Lance as well.  I do not buy into that nonsense because if you have that great team and you perform at a high level, what were you supposed to do?

The thing I like about Lance is this: He has the speed and running ability, but rarely do his feet move before he has made the decision not to throw.  That (to me) reflects decisiveness--the QB has a clock, when the routes are not open, he snaps into run mode and the pass is not going to happen.  With other running qbs, they tend to read while on the run, often throwing just before they cross the LOS.  That creates problems for the WRs, OL, etc.   Timing is off, linemen not knowing if they should block down field, and the throw is often less than accurate because the feet are not firmly planted to throw--usually all arm.  Mahommes can do this, but I am not sure I want a 1 year, 20 year old kid from SDSU making those freelance (no pun) decisions in the NFL--at least not early on.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

What little there is of it.  I wouldn't want my job riding on picking one of these guys to succeed.  I just don't see what others see in these guys beyond Trevor.  Even he has an uphill battle where he's going.

They all have red flags and question marks--including Trevor, but to a lesser degree.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bostonheelfish said:

He was pretty bad with throws to his right at his pro day. First round picks can’t have that problem; especially when he’s had an entire year to learn how to throw not left.

Interesting point.  Chris Weinke could not throw across his body (to his left) and the NFL learned that very quickly.  I think he beat Minnesota for the opener and proceeded to lose 15 straight.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

They all have red flags and question marks--including Trevor, but to a lesser degree.

Yes they do.  Too many think this is a slam dunk picking any of the supposed top 4 but I suggest buyer beware.  Going into the NFL is a whole different level than these guys are use to, even for Lawrence and Jones.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NAS said:

That’s where attitude and work ethic comes into play. I believe that physical tools are God given and everything else can be learned with good coaching, hard work and determination 

Unfortunately that's not the case. There's been countless athletic QBs who could throw the ball to the moon (from their knees) who never learned to read an NFL defence - despite being the first guy in the building and the last one out every week.

It's a tool - much like guys are born with a million dollar arm, guys are born with the ability to quickly process what's going on in front of them and make the right decision.

You can develop that skill, much like you can improve your arm strength, but there's limits to how much you can improve it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

Yes they do.  Too many think this is a slam dunk picking any of the supposed top 4 but I suggest buyer beware.  Going into the NFL is a whole different level than these guys are use to, even for Lawrence and Jones.  

We have many more options than people on the Huddle are willing to consider.  They focus on one guy, then defend that guy come hell or high water, because they want to be right.  But the more you dig, the more likely you are to find buried bodies.   Personally, I am interested in QBs who are being trashed because they were in horrible systems--no OL, no WRs, etc.  No QB can look good with that.  People agree with that statement until I mention names--then they become Captain Hindsight and start saying, "He sucks."  My point:  "Well duh-have you seen his OL? WRs?  Coach?  So instead of forcing the issue by trading up for the fourth best gamble at QB and losing draft capital and players, I am not against a 1-year contract for a player who might prosper in a system where the OL is solid, WRs are on point, and the coach understands his strengths.  Personally, I want to see who signs Trubiski.  I want to see where Mariota and Darnold go.  I think one or more will find a system to be reborn. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Bostonheelfish said:

He was pretty bad with throws to his right at his pro day. First round picks can’t have that problem; especially when he’s had an entire year to learn how to throw not left.

I didn't watch his pro day, but he was noticeably worse in his one start last year. His footwork regressed massively. That's a huge worry.

To me, Lance is a second round pick that you take and stash for a year or so. Let your QB Coach fix his footwork and hope he picks up NFL speed / concepts in practice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pup McBarky said:

No one is going to dispute the guy has incredible physical tools. The key questions are: can he develop into a consistent thrower? Can he read complex NFL defenses and process options? He's never had to do either, but he'll have to do both if he's to be successful in the NFL.

That's my only hitch on this guy. He has everything except the tape against top tier defenses. He's young, though, so learning it isn't out of the question. He also seems to be a student of the game and motivated to improve beyond just his physical gifts.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, he's not the guy I want at #8 for QB, but if we get him, I'll be darned happy with the choice. His upside is incredible, even if he may not be ready for prime time right out of the gate. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...