Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun Allegations detailed (not good)


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/03/18/second-lawsuit-filed-lawyer-claims-six-total-claims-are-coming-against-deshaun-watson/

To say nothing about the veracity of the claims by the women involved, for or a guy who claims to not be doing it for the attention, this ambulance chaser sure is doing a LOT of talking about himself and his accomplishments. For a guy who claims to not be doing it for the money, it'll be interesting to see what happens with any of his payouts if there ends up being any money collected in these suits. Spoiler alert: they'll end up in his bank account.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Icege said:

Do you think that it's garbage to make this focus on the effects on a football team 's logistics and not the effects of assault on victims?

I think that the entire situation seems unsavory, tawdry and mysteriously convenient though untoward and perverse, but at this point I'm not so sure I would call anyone a true "victim" of legitimate assault.

I mean, here we have a guy that knows the team owner a few weeks before the draft coming out, slinging mud and basically being the epitome of a sleazeball ambulance chaser in the service of all women (I assume) who were either professional or wannabe masseuses, at least one being willing to fly across the country to give a guy a young rich guy a "massage", and from the accounts I read were instructed at different points to the level of service required but either balked and/or got brand new when it came time to do the job. I even find the fact that at least the first three--if not all--are masseuses is kinda weird. It all just sounds a little too convenient. I also find it more than disingenuous that the ambulance chaser attempted to get six figures to make the first case go away, but now is suddenly about the "victims" who are only suing now for $500.

I'm certainly not going to make moral judgments based upon people on a football message board based on these allegations, particularly before more actual facts come out, the seriousness of the behavior (which hasn't risen to criminality), or before our own management who has obviously been considering acquiring Watson (which will affect the team) either "dismisses" this situation or rejects acquiring Watson out of hand, as it could have some type of consequence on the franchise. As such, all discussion is still on the table, regardless of where you think it should be focused.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Leotiger said:

Uneducatedly I think, McNair is the one pushing for this( no proof just pure speculation)..  Watson refusing to play for them and McNair refusing to trade him... forced McNair to get creative and play some real low life cards... I think this is if you won’t play for me you won’t play for anybody... What if Watson got #metooed would they be on the hook for his contract ? If allegations are true how much of the money can save on the cap and future guaranteed money.. and the main reason is McNair is setting this standard so that any future star player is wanting to demand out know that Texans wont play ball and you will sit while they figure the best legal ways to recoup any money’s that they might be legally owed or can void..

 

very insecure controversial and conspiracy take .. I am ape and no NFL journalist just a crazy random panther fan with too much time on his hands haha

If I was an nfl investigator I would be looking into this lawyer being McNair “neighbor”.. also see if McNair or his business interests supported this lawyers past election campaigns.. even so it would just be a bad look not an proven wrong doing by McNair 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Leotiger said:

If I was an nfl investigator I would be looking into this lawyer being McNair “neighbor”.. also see if McNair or his business interests supported this lawyers past election campaigns.. even so it would just be a bad look not an proven wrong doing by McNair 

Oh, there's probably going to be mudslinging in the other direction. This guy is not an angel, and I doubt the masseuses are either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Smittymoose said:

This is foolishness. You're wrong again. Many states do not require parties to pay jury fees. Of those that do, the fee is typically minimal, and that minimal fee can be waived by application to the court. 

Not in Texas, sweet tits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Oh, there's probably going to be mudslinging in the other direction. This guy is not an angel, and I doubt the masseuses are either.

This is going to get ugly.. its bad for business all the way around ... I hope the end result is McNair is forced to sell and Watson comes to Carolina cheaper and obviously all the allegations are debunked and tossed ... sad 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:
27 minutes ago, Smittymoose said:

Like you? You just said there's no jury in civil trials, which is patently wrong. If a party requests a jury trial in a civil case, it generally has a right to one unless it is in a lesser court such as a magistrate court. You might check the Constitution, Seventh Amendment. 

Expand  

Yea, the party have to pay for jury too that’s why most civil cases have no jury.  There’s a reason it’s civil and not criminal.

Attached is a bit blurry but in the complaint against Watson a jury trial is specifically requested. 

FYI.

8E655BA2-21A3-45D5-A347-52F68B2D38D4.jpeg

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

Civil courts are design to settle.  It will likely be cheaper for him to settle and just sweep the whole thing under the rug.  The main goal here is to destroy Watson’s image and cost him millions in endorsements.  Watson have to decide if he wants to lose $15-$20m in endorsements to prove his point and pay that asshole $5mm and he done with it or to fight it and likely lose $20-40mm in both endorsement, legal costs and likely game checks.

This is all by design.  100% this is orchestrated by McNair to destroy Watson’s image and bank account.  Smartest thing is to settle and get the duck out of Houston.

The plaintiffs want $500 each. They want him to admit he’s guilty.

If he admits to this, it would be very hard for an org like the Panthers to bring him in given their history.

If he doesn’t settle, this will stretch on for at least a year or so and we’ll have no choice but to move on with another QB.

Thats all I’m saying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

 Smartest thing is to settle and get the duck out of Houston.

In the court of public opinion settling would serve as an admission of guilt.  

As we saw in the Richardson case, "confidential" settlements don't always remain that way.  

Slippery slope settling is...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Leotiger said:

She only wants $500 bucks ??? Looks like Watson trade will be on hold till further notice .... 

Not at all what they're asking for if you read the Complaint. Just a lawyer's trick to say it's not about money. They have to ask for at least $500 to invoke the jurisdiction of that court, apparently, in Texas. They are seeking emotional distress and punitive damages as well. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...