Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers signing WR David Moore

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheProcess Rising Star

TheProcess

Posted
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, imminent rogaine said:

Not slept on over here. He got some attention in the senior bowl. Finishes mean. Athletic. I feel like his height pushes him down to the 5th or later.

If he was available at the end of round 4, I am trading up to make sure I get him. Height isn't ideal, but that arm length is

Edited by TheProcess
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Moo Daeng Experienced

Moo Daeng

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Depends on what he does. He's a WR4 tbh that may be able to play the 3.  It's average. 

He was Seattle's 3 in yards and tds.

Those aren't positions they are fantasy terms. He seems to play a variety of actual receiver positions int terms of x,z, etc with some recerses and handoffs like Curtis did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Moo Daeng said:

He was Seattle's 3 in yards and tds.

Those aren't positions they are fantasy terms. He seems to play a variety of actual receiver positions int terms of x,z, etc with some recerses and handoffs like Curtis did.

Not saying that this really means a whole lot, as they may have just been trying to upgrade on the cheap, but Seattle did acquire Josh Gordon as their 3, but of course he just fuged it up. I think they gave Moore an opportunity to be that guy, but for whatever reason he just never got the overall production. If you look at his stats, they're very much pedestrian. Now it could've been his situation, or maybe Wilson just didn't need to rely on  him as much, but I wouldn't expect the guy to legitimately move the chains like Samuel. I know Seattle runs a lot, but so do we (or at least we used to). Maybe Moore is on the verge of a breakout, but I've seen him play and I see him as more of a JAG receiver who has his few moments. This is not to take away from what he does, but I think his salary reflects my thinking about him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, top dawg said:

Not saying that this really means a whole lot, as they may have just been trying to upgrade on the cheap, but Seattle did acquire Josh Gordon as their 3, but of course he just fuged it up. I think they gave Moore an opportunity to be that guy, but for whatever reason he just never got the overall production. If you look at his stats, they're very much pedestrian. Now it could've been his situation, or maybe Wilson just didn't need to rely on  him as much, but I wouldn't expect the guy to legitimately move the chains like Samuel. I know Seattle runs a lot, but so do we (or at least we used to). Maybe Moore is on the verge of a breakout, but I've seen him play and I see him as more of a JAG receiver who has his few moments. This is not to take away from what he does, but I think his salary reflects my thinking about him.

Moore play a lot less because of Metcalf, Lockett, and Baldwin that use to be there but still put up 13 tds last three years. Samuel play a lot more last two years but doesn’t have a lot more production. Hell of a deal I love it, definitely wouldn’t pay Samuel what he wanted that’s crazy 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, BurnNChinn said:

Moore play a lot less because of Metcalf, Lockett, and Baldwin that use to be there but still put up 13 tds last three years. Samuel play a lot more last two years but doesn’t have a lot more production. Hell of a deal I love it, definitely wouldn’t pay Samuel what he wanted that’s crazy 

I wouldn't say it's crazy, we just couldn't afford him. Samuel played more because he's a more versatile and dynamic player! Good receivers will find their way on to the field (under most coaches). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrevorLaurenceTime22 Grand Master

TrevorLaurenceTime22

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, top dawg said:

I wouldn't say it's crazy, we just couldn't afford him. Samuel played more because he's a more versatile and dynamic player! Good receivers will find their way on to the field (under most coaches). 

Agreed as good as Samuel was he wasn't going to be more than our #3 and with a healthy CMC that is more realistically our #4.... I really liked Curtis going back to Ron Rivera ball and Scott Turner I doubt he lives up to the contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Monday practice tweets

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I get it's subjective and I said "PFF rated him as" one of the top deep ball passers during that time, which is an accurate statement.  They are still a group of professionals that look at film and data in order to make their judgements/ratings.  These people whose data has been incorporated into a lot of teams' staffs view Bryce's deep throws as some of the best in the league during that stretch.  That tells me that he can probably throw a deep pass vs the Huddle's version of he is small and didn't do it his rookie year so he must not be able to.  That and literally seeing him do it just makes me feel he is more than capable of doing so.   Do you think PFF is skewing their opinion to prop up a QB in a bottom tier franchise?  It's just another group's opinion and I feel is pretty respected around the league currently.  It's not the gospel truth or anything.  
    • Basbear
      Monday practice tweets

      By Basbear · Posted

      I still remember how happy I was that gettlegut was not the GM once he picked Jones, that was a firing pick and well..... If not for the raiders drafting Clelin Ferrell, it was the biggest draft day mistake in the last 20 some years. 
    • frankw
      Monday practice tweets

      By frankw · Posted

      He had 251 passing yards. 3 passing touchdowns and 2 rushing touchdowns. All in all a very impressive game. Problem is I do not envision his rushing ability translating like that over the course of the upcoming season. Yeah it will be something to account for from time to time but one it's not sustainable and two you don't want to put his durability to the ultimate test against a motivated defender willing to take a penalty and a fine. And plus with our backfield. Two 1k yard rushers. That's what they're here for. Then we have a much improved WR room. That means Bryce has to elevate those passing numbers substantially. The fact of the matter is regardless of circumstances it did take him 23 games to surpass Kyle Allen's single season passing yardage from 13 games in 2020. And that is not a high bar by any means. Whatever QB tier Bryce ends up in from here amongst his peers this upcoming season when it's all said and done it will be with his arm.
×
×
  • Create New...