Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go on record. Who still wants Watson?

Sasquatch

By Sasquatch,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

YourLastThought Mentor

YourLastThought

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, frankw said:

Since when is being a father a negative? That's quite the leap in logic. Can see the kind of circles you run in with remarks like this.

Being a father can easily be a negative if the father is abusive (physically, mentally, sexually), absent, or just an overall jackass. I doubt Cam is any of those as he was a great community guy while here and a solid role model for kids everywhere. You however have a brief history of judging everyone's backgrounds, or logic pretty quick if it does not completely agree with your own politics. I suggest you check out and spend lots of time in the tinder box with the tinderbox mafia. That area would be more your schtick I do believe. I do agree with you if you are implying that there is not a damn thing wrong with Cam as a community leader and role model but you seem to be often on the attack of anyone who does not follow your exact beliefs so I say you fit right in with those tinderbox boys and you have my vote for Nozzle Of The Week congrats ole' chap.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Agent Blue said:

That goes for anyone. 

Imo, you should only have kids in wedlock and not produce single moms and kids not growing up in nuclear families. 

Just because 2 people are married doesn't qualify them as parents. There are tons of married couples who have no business being parents. A couple that has been together for 25 years and doesn't get their relationship legally recognized in no way makes them incapable of raising kids. And how many people are still married that shouldn't be? 

A piece of paper doesn't mean you have a good relationship and are capable of raising children. The hardest question on that test is what's your name. 

Edited by SmokinwithWilly
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Agent Blue Newbie

Agent Blue

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Just because 2 people are married doesn't qualify them as parents. There are tons of married couples who have no business being parents. A couple that has been together for 25 years and doesn't get their relationship legally recognized in no way makes them incapable of raising kids. And how people are still married that shouldn't be? 

A piece of paper doesn't mean you have a good relationship and are capable of raising children. The hardest question on that test is what's your name. 

Bruh, 

I am aware people can live together their entire life and not be married. 

That's typically not the case though. 

 

Edited by Agent Blue
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Just because 2 people are married doesn't qualify them as parents. There are tons of married couples who have no business being parents. A couple that has been together for 25 years and doesn't get their relationship legally recognized in no way makes them incapable of raising kids. And how people are still married that shouldn't be? 

A piece of paper doesn't mean you have a good relationship and are capable of raising children. The hardest question on that test is what's your name. 

His dead cap money is 30000 in 2022 unless I am reading that wrong.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Agent Blue said:

Bruh, 

I am aware people can live together their entire life and not be married. 

That's typically not the case though. 

 

No. Your assertion was that only married people should have kids. Commitment isn't defined by a piece of paper nor does it qualify them to be a parent. Over half the marriages in this country end in divorce. Using that as the measuring stick to define who should and shouldn't be allowed to be a parent is a weak standard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Agent Blue said:

Running around creating a lot of single mothers is not something commendable lol 

No one said commendable. Lumping it in with a discussion about harrassment and assault however is an odd leap.

It is curious that you have made so many posts defending Watson but in your moral compass you apparently draw the line at being a father to children by different women. Seems inconsistent.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Agent Blue Newbie

Agent Blue

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, frankw said:

No one said commendable. Lumping it in with a discussion about harrassment and assault however is an odd leap.

It is curious that you have made so many posts defending Watson but in your moral compass you apparently draw the line at being a father to children by different women. Seems inconsistent.

that wasn't me who mentioned that. that never crossed my mind. 

although, I saw the comment and replied. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Agent Blue Newbie

Agent Blue

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

No. Your assertion was that only married people should have kids. Commitment isn't defined by a piece of paper nor does it qualify them to be a parent. Over half the marriages in this country end in divorce. Using that as the measuring stick to define who should and shouldn't be allowed to be a parent is a weak standard. 

No, I made a general statement of my opinion. 

Of course there are exceptions. 

Two loving responsible people together without marriage would be a better family than a married dysfunctional irresponsible family. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

Being a father can easily be a negative if the father is abusive (physically, mentally, sexually), absent, or just an overall jackass. I doubt Cam is any of those as he was a great community guy while here and a solid role model for kids everywhere. You however have a brief history of judging everyone's backgrounds, or logic pretty quick if it does not completely agree with your own politics. I suggest you check out and spend lots of time in the tinder box with the tinderbox mafia. That area would be more your schtick I do believe. I do agree with you if you are implying that there is not a damn thing wrong with Cam as a community leader and role model but you seem to be often on the attack of anyone who does not follow your exact beliefs so I say you fit right in with those tinderbox boys and you have my vote for Nozzle Of The Week congrats ole' chap.

Uhh if you want my advice try a few deep woosahs and a nice long walk sir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, Agent Blue said:

They often go hand in hand.

You can't be convinced of something you don't understand. 

 

I'm not trying to convince you of anything, just help you understand. Whether or not you want to be convinced to change your opinion/behavior/whatever is on you.

I'm good on the idea though that you have to be convinced to understand why what you said is seen as ignorant in regards to expectations/perceptions of victims of sexual misconduct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 45catfan
      Evero HC requests!

      By 45catfan · Posted

      They are obviously waiting on for someone o the Seahawks or Patriots staff.  If they wanted Evero, it would be a done deal already. The only silver lining is if the guy they are waiting for turns them down.  In that instance I do think Evero is their backup plan.
    • tukafan21
      Evero HC requests!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Evero to the Raiders makes zero sense unless the OC he's pitching them is a failed HC who doesn't have interest in trying for it again. They're a team about to draft a QB #1 overall, developing him is job #1 for the new coach/staff.  Hiring a DC with a young up and coming OC wouldn't make any sense, because then you risk losing that OC to a HC job after maybe just a year or two and that young QB has to change system, play caller, etc. It's why hiring an offensive minded coach makes the only sense.  The Raiders have to make the right hire/pick with this HC hire and #1 pick combo because of that division they're in, it's a gauntlet and you can't screw up this opportunity.  
    • Khyber53
      Very intrigued how Morgan and Canales handle the offseason

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      1. Sadly, it's just too early to tell with Icky. And the draft will have come and gone before we have anything, FA, too probably. Njiman was good, but there's dollars to be invested there as well. This is really our biggest puzzle to figure out. And Moton on the other flank is getting long in the tooth, too.  2. Coker: Pay the man WR2 money.  3. Most WRs take three years before you really know what you've got. We'll know for sure by the end of this one and he's still on a relatively inexpensive rookie contract. Now if someone comes calling for a good, good trade... 4. This is the make or break for good teams vs bad teams. And depth development is essential. We've had a bit of that but there isn't a spot on our line that doesn't have worries except for maybe on guard.  5. I think you draft the best ILB, the smartest one in the first round and don't look back. People lost their poo here on this board when we "wasted" a pick on Luke Kuechly.  6. Yeah, I think Chuba is a workhorse. But we need to be more decisive in his use. Still not sure Rico doesn't come back next season, too. He'll get to see the marketplace first, though, and we'll offer similar numbers to him.  
×
×
  • Create New...