Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Miller is back


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

The contracts we paid Erving and Elflein are starters for a minimum of 2 years. No idea what Miller’s was but last year he was getting just under average starter money. I’d assume he got less this year.

I’m assuming we’ll go T early (hoping Erving isn’t out LT answer) but I don’t think we’ll be jumping all over OL which is too bad as it seems like a good class.

I’ll agree to disagree....there isn’t a offensive lineman on our team with the exception of Moton that the team won’t upgrade if they deem him worthy. If you think Cam Erving or Pat Elflein will prevent us from drafting a potential 10 year solid starter then idk what to tell you.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CashNewton22 said:

I’ll agree to disagree....there isn’t a offensive lineman on our team with the exception of Moton that the team won’t upgrade if they deem him worthy. If you think Cam Erving or Pat Elflein will prevent us from drafting a potential 10 year solid starter then idk what to tell you.

I don't think they prevent us from drafting linemen, but I wouldn't bet on rookie linemen taken lower than the first round starting immediately.

Granted it's possible, but not likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't think they prevent us from drafting linemen, but I wouldn't bet on rookie linemen taken lower than the first round starting immediately.

Granted it's possible, but not likely.

Of course not I don’t count on rookies much in general that’s not the point I’m arguing. I’m saying if they have a high grade on Deonte Brown (or whoever) and he’s there when we pick Cam Irving/John Miller/whoever won’t prevent us from drafting him even if it takes a little while for him to be ready to start. 

Edited by CashNewton22
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't think they prevent us from drafting linemen, but I wouldn't bet on rookie linemen taken lower than the first round starting immediately.

Granted it's possible, but not likely.

SO you go into round 3 and day 3 hoping to find a player who could possibly compete in 2022.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...