Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

49ers just traded to possibly get....Mac Jones


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LobsAllDay said:

you say that when a 43 year old tom brady just won the sb. 

people act like every mobile qb is the second coming of mahomes or watson. Those are once in a generation type players. Trey Lance and fields are no where close to those two coming out. 

Yes with 2 top 10 WR'S and Antione Brown, A hoF TE a top 5 Oline, and top 5 defense... If you can build that well I guess you got a chance.. If he's the greatest Competitor ever as well... But please stop acting like Tom Brady is easy to repeat...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Just a question...

Are all average arm no athleticism QBS going to be the next Tom Brady from now on????

as long as they're white...

but ya know, Brady wasn't Brady until a few seasons in, so there's still time for Kyle Allen!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LobsAllDay said:

you say that when a 43 year old tom brady just won the sb. 

people act like every mobile qb is the second coming of mahomes or watson. Those are once in a generation type players. Trey Lance and fields are no where close to those two coming out. 

And Tom Brady isn't once in a generation???

Omg!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LobsAllDay said:

Thank you for proving my point. McShay...lol. 
 

  And comparing one small part of Jones game, like he did, is not the same as you calling him a mobile version of two of the best QBs ever. The difference is what happened once they decided to throw the ball. One guy had a great arm and the fastest release in NFL history. The other underthrows deep balls on a consistent basis. But you should be ecstatic. Your team just traded the farm for him. You got your man. Congrats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, LobsAllDay said:

49ers owner is john lynch. not arthur blank..

Welcome to the conversation. You might want to start off by reading my initial post where I asked why someone in the know said the falcons were drafting Justin fields at 4 in this scenario where Jones goes off the board at 3. I asked this because they just restructured Ryan in a way that seemingly ties him to be the starter for the next 2 years.

The guy that answered (who wasn’t who i was hoping would answer the question) suggested that it’s because  Arthur Blank “has balls”. I have no doubt this guy thinks  having truck nuts hanging from his trailer hitch from his F-150 is clever in 2021 but was curious to hear his take on why Arthur Blank who kept Dan Quinn two years too long is Don Corleone.

Good luck with Mac Jones and Kyle “I should probably run the ball a time or two in the 4th quarter of a super bowl that I have a big lead in” Shanahan.

Edited by X-Clown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a person who wouldn't mind Mac Jones at 7, and while I think if there's a guy you like get him

I cannot believe they traded up to 3 for Mac Jones.

That said I think Mac Jones compares favorably to Matt Ryan so I think this is just the type of QB Shanny likes.

Shout outs to the Dolphins though turned their LT into 4 first round picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now it's possible the 49ers really do love Mac Jones and still possible he turns into a great qb, especially on a loaded 49ers team. But it's hard to think SF decided they needed to move up to 3 to get him especially after Miami proceeds to trade that very pick to Philly to move up to 6 where Mac would almost certainly still be available and not have to lose that 2023 1st.

Moving up to 3 for Fields or even Lance on paper makes a lot more sense because neither is guaranteed to be there at 6. But teams do strange things all the time. Sounds like them drafting Jones is mostly educated conjecture so I'm not hanging my hat on it either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sometimes you get very valuable information from fantasy football sites. I found an analysis that you may want to read from The Fantasy Footballers. Perhaps you'll gain an insight as to why we moved up and got him. As always, here are a few snippets: "As expected, he dominated in the 2023 season. He averaged an impressive 2.03 Scrimmage Yards per Team Play, which ranks in the 86th percentile among all junior seasons since 2013." "Naturally, after initially playing behind two NFL-caliber running backs, Brooks’ career numbers do not jump off the page. However, his 2023 campaign gave us a glimpse of just how massive his upside could be at the next level. In fact, Brooks is one of only TWO running backs in this class to exceed 2.00 Scrimmage Yards per Team Play within their first three seasons in college."  "If you watch Jonathon Brooks’ film, you will find multiple plays in which he created yardage with his quick feet and lateral agility. He is elusive in open spaces and has an impressive ability to stack multiple cuts to avoid contact. Combined with his impressive burst and acceleration, Brooks can be a matchup nightmare in the second and third levels of the defense." "While Brooks is not the most physical running back, he does have a knack for absorbing contact and bouncing off defenders. You see this time and time again in his film." "He showcased a willingness to initiate contact with the pass rusher, the strength to maintain blocks, and the quickness to adjust to the defender’s moves. In addition, per PFF, Brooks was a top-three running back in the 2024 class in pass-blocking grade last season. He was also one of only two running backs in the class to average a 0% pass block pressure rate, highlighting just how effective he was as a blocker." "In short, Brooks has tremendous upside as a prospect. Even with his ACL injury, I would still be comfortable drafting him in the early second round of rookie drafts. In fact, I would not be shocked if he finished his career as the most productive running back in this class. However, we just need to temper our expectations for his rookie year as he slowly ramps up to full health." Marvin Elequin provides more here (including video clips): https://www.thefantasyfootballers.com/dynasty/2024-rookie-profile-rb-jonathon-brooks-fantasy-football/   Basically, Brooks has the potential to be a beast, and was well worth the 46th pick (and most mocks had him going mid second round anyway). He's not JAG. Someone had to make the move and take him, and we were the ones to do it. He's elusive, has good speed and acceleration, exceptional contact balance, and is an outstanding blocker. Just like any nice RB transitioning to the league, he will need to get used to taking what the defense gives him, while also showing discriminating patience, but he has demonstrated some ability on that front in college. Brooks' only real knock is the ACL. But ACLs aren't career ending anymore, or even skill ending as evidenced by Dalvin Cook, Todd Gurley and others. We'll just need to temper our expectations during his rookie campaign while he gets back to form. Once he does, we'll finally have the talented three-down back that has eluded us since Stew retired.
    • https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619
    • 2.43 : Jackson Powers-Johnson, C, Oregon 2.52 : Adonai Mitchell, WR, Texas 3.65 : Junior Colson, LB, Michigan 3.79 : Blake Corum, RB, Michigan 4.101 : Ja'Tavion Sanders, TE, Texas 😎 5.141 : Sedrick Van Pran-Granger, C, Georgia 5.142 : Austin Booker, Edge, Kansas 5.155 : Christian Jones, OT, Texas Note, I traded down from 33 (took the Arizona/Atlanta trade up to 35 - might have actually been able to net an even better deal but whatever, I'll go with this). Took the Rams trade but stayed put at 52 and at the top of the 3rd.
×
×
  • Create New...