Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why the Niners didn't trade to #2


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

 

our 4th is a high one this year, so it seems fair.  Our high 3rd seems too much.

If we have our QB, then that's a draft pick slot filled that we otherwise would have used. Plus, we could either move back in the first or second round to recoup the Darnold pick.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

About that...

 

Yeah Darnold is in a tough position for getting moved. I could get behind him if we think we are totally out of the QB drafting market. But I dont think there is a huge improvement from him and Teddy

Honestly I think year 2 Teddy would be better than year 1 Darnold + a pick. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Ryan Tannehill kind of changed the landscape for QBs drafted high that don't pan out initially. It seems more teams are open to reclamation projects at the QB position and acknowledge crappy teams make even decent prospects look crappy.

How many QBs careers have the Jets ruined?  At some point you have to look at the organization instead of the players.  I don't think Darnold is all that and a bag of chips, but he's not horrible either.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

How many QBs careers have the Jets ruined?  At some point you have to look at the organization instead of the players.  I don't think Darnold is all that and a bag of chips, but he's not horrible either.

Back in October there was a Twitter army trying to convince Trevor to stay a year and avoid NY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthercougar68 said:

Back in October there was a Twitter army trying to convince Trevor to stay a year and avoid NY.

Lucky for him Jax tanked harder than the Jets, although I don't think the Jets were tanking.  Sadly they only won one more game than the Jags actually trying.  Not that going to Jacksonville is much better, BTW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

Just for sheets and giggles...would Minshew's be about the same? Honestly, I might like him more, and he'd be $9M cheaper this year.

Which may be the reason they hold onto him for Trevor's rookie season.

This would have to be a good offer--like a third and a conditional 2022 pick. (speculating, but when I do that, I am never wrong)

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option s a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The patter it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
    • Dude, I'm saying the Cardinals have proven they know nothing. Not saying keeping Bryce is the best choice long term, just saying that we've made the right move for this moment in time.  But man, the Cardinals are never a blueprint for success. Haven't been since they were in Chicago.
×
×
  • Create New...