Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers split personnel to watch Justin Fields and Mac Jones' pro days


Panthers316
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Brady is in Alabama, meanwhile Rhule and Fitterer are in Ohio. Pretty clear which one we're prioritizing.

Given Rhule has already seen Mac Jones quite a bit, in this particular case, I wouldn't read TOO much into it.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, stbugs said:

He could easily be there in the third. He’d be a huge reach at our 2nd pick after looking terrible at the Senior Bowl, nothing close to an NFL starter. I’d say there’s a higher chance than he never becomes a backup than becomes a real NFL starter. I’m not talking about a Will Grier throw him to the wolves even though we know he’s not good start.

Pretty sure he was the MVP of the Senior Bowl. A team will reach for him. I don’t think he makes it past the 2nd...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

That game featured the worst QBs they ever had. Sorry, but getting an MVP for a 52% completion percentage means there was just no one else. The other 4 QBs are day 3 or undrafted guys and looked the part. There was 1 RB at 60 yards all others had 15 or below and one WR at 90 with all others at 52 or below.

It really wasn’t a good offensive game at all. Mond didn’t look good, he just threw the ball the most. Maybe someone takes him in the 2nd (it only takes 1) but I think he’s got a great shot at making the 3rd. If we took him at 39, it would be a terrible pick. Maybe it works out but it would be a huge reach with a huge chance of failure.

I don’t want us to draft him at 39. I’m just saying I think another team will overdraft him ahead of our 3rd pick. He looked decent in the Senior Bowl, started off rusty but got in rhythm and made some nice throws with 2 TDs and 0 INTs in a game where the line wasn’t blocking well.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...