Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Behind the scenes insights


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:


I imagine the timeline could have gone a little something like this under a different GM:

=-=-

On Monday Apr 5th, Hurney ordered a meatball sub from Subway like he always does. Spilled some sauce on his shirt.  The sauce made a pattern like an airplane as Marty tried to wipe up the mess with one of those tiny Subway napkins.

"An airplane? That's like a jet", Marty mumbles. "I wonder if the Jets have anybody worth trading with?  DARN IT, this stain isn't coming out.  Darn it.  Darn it........   hrm....  Darnold?"

That afternoon, fingers still greasy from the meatball remnants on his fingers, Hurney picks up the handset and spins the rotary dial. Once, twice, three times the rotary dial spins, making a satisfying "click click noise".

"Hello, this is 411. How can I help you?" says the operator.
"What's the number to the Jets locker room?"  Moments later, Marty is talking to the locker room janitor, who figures this is one of those prank calls he's laughed at on the Simpsons.

"What do we want for Darnold? Oh I'll play along.  How about a 6th, 2nd, and 4th?"  The janitor chuckles with himself for recognizing a prank caller, knowing that nobody would ever believe that was a real answer.

Marty shouts into the phone, "IT'S A DEAL!" and slams the receiver down back in its cradle.
He proudly puts on a fingerless glove, puts a feathered earring into his ear, and walks off into the sunset across the football field, raising his fist in the air with a sense of accomplishment as the soft strains of Simple Minds plays on his Walkman strapped to his fanny pack.

 

439280880_tenor(4).gif.091ed7f6f4e1c0aa95fe69e17b63e0ba.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moo Daeng said:

It's the echo chamber effect. 

And this suck for Sam Howell thing is the next bullet in the chamber.  Well be hearing folks complain about week 3 wins for Sam Howell......lol

Says the king of his own echo chamber. We get it, man. You're the smartest person here. You never actually offer an opinion, but everyone else is always an idiot. It's easy to always be right when you never actually state an opinion other than generic homerism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading up to three would leave us with Jones, Fields and Lance.  Wilson is going to be gone at 2 to the Jets.  Staying at 8 may leave us with one of them.   

I think they made the right decision on negotiating with the Jets for Darnold.  Though many think we gave too much for Darnold we have to remember they wanted a 1st for him.  We stood strong and got him for much less, plus we kept most of our draft picks for this year.  I am impressed with the negotiations and got him for a fair deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, SOJA said:

I think the problem with trading with Miami was (at the time) the Panthers were trying to conserve as many assets as possible for a Deshaun trade. 

 

I just think that they were asking way too much (as the article said in so many words). That's a lot to give up, even during this time of QB scarcity drunkenness! It was too much, just like the Rams' payment was too much. Too much for our situation anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moo Daeng said:

This makes it really hard to believe they were ever too serious about throwing  years of drafts for Watson.

That thought has crossed my mind.

LG is correct. If they were looking at trading up for the #3 pick, the plan would have been to draft a rookie. Even the article says part of the reason they didn't do it was because they hadn't finished evaluating the prospects.

In addition, seeing that Fitterer "balked" at what Miami wanted for that third pick, it raises the distinct possibility that even if we did want to push for Watson, some of the outlandish trade packages fans and some analysts speculated we were willing to give up might have been way way waaay off the mark.

(at the very least, I think you'd probably have to believe that the whole "any price" story was bullsh-t)

Throw in Fitterer's comment about leaving misinformation out there if it works to our advantage, and who knows?

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should add that I think the one narrative this story completely destroys is the idea that David Tepper was at any point standing behind Rhule and Fitterer cracking a whip and telling them to trade the farm, the kitchen sink and everything else for one player.

Truthfully, outside of his getting regular reports on how things were going, it doesn't sound like Tepper was involved all that much in this process at all.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I think we will get most of it back when we ditch the Bridge. 

Not too worried.  They wanted a first, and Fitts could have squeezed them--we seemed to have the leverage, but in the grand scheme of things, we gave up about 230 draft points to get him (if you devalue next year's picks one round).  230 points is nearly the exact value of this year's 3rd rounder.

2021, round 6: 12.6 points

2022, round 2 (if we finish in middle of the pack, #16):  190 points (third round value in 2021)

2022, round 4 (if we finish in middle of the pack, #16):  25.8 points (fifth round value in 2021)

So if we get a 3rd rounder in 2021 or a future 2nd for Bridgewater, it balances out.  even steven

Season 3 Episode 23 GIF by Friends - Find & Share on GIPHY

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...