Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don't want Penei round 1


CarForLife
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

Value vs. expectation.  The draft is deep on the OL, but we are looking for starters and while you can surely get some quality depth later in the draft, it is unrealistic to think they could turn into starters.  Thus good value, but unrealistic expectation.

I don't think it's unrealistic to expect a starter in the second round in general, much less the top of the second or end of the first. 

When people say it's a "deep draft" at a particular position, they are talking about guys who have a good shot at turning into starters.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, top dawg said:

That's so true, but he was blown up because of the line, and that should be their priority. Cinci would be making a Jerry Jones move if they pick Chase! 

But if they believe they can get a starting tackle at 37 then they could take the best wideout and still protect their franchise QB.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, CarForLife said:

So you would take Sewell over Pitts if they are both sitting there that's crazy

I love pitts... he is who I want in my mind.. but in my heart I know we need sewell more so. Hes generational in terms of tackles and is only 20. He is the Pitts of tackles. We keep replaces tackles every season. End the struggle at LT.

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Italianpantherfan said:

You don’t want a position that we haven’t had since Jordan gross ? Especially when this kid is once in a life time left tackle and is only 20 years old . I hope he falls to us this guy is the best I ever seen I’d even take him over pitts you and can’t pass him up whoever is on the board . He should be going #1

You can find those in the second or third round it's deep with offensive lineman you guys are nuts

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...