Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Post your mock drafts !


Leotiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

I have a very very hard time believing Chase would make it past Cincy Miami and Detroit unless there's a feeding frenzy on QBs and OTs before 8 . Or some teams ahead of us make some very unexpected defensive player picks . 

I REALLY think the Niners are taking Jones.  That would be huge.  Pitts to Atlanta is the latest rumor.  The Bengals will prolly take Chase or Sewell, and the Dolphins may entertain a trade for Lance or Fields.  Gonna be crazy if SF goes with Jones and ATL goes Non-qb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

Okay. Say we get chase . Now how do we use our over abundance of WRs? Who starts? Who is the odd man out ? Are you just going to put dj in the slot or something ? 

1.) I'd trade down if possible if Chase were there at 8. I think Chase is a bit overrated in the media, so he's more likely to be there at 8 than most people think imo.

2.) Practice and competition decides who starts.

3.) I would not play DJ in the slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 SIMULATOR

  • CAR
    13.
    Christian Darrisaw
    OT Virginia Tech
    trade icon
  • CAR
    39.
    Wyatt Davis
    OG Ohio State
     
  • CAR
    47.
    Asante Samuel Jr.
    CB Florida State
    trade icon
  • CAR
    77.
    Amari Rodgers
    WR Clemson
    trade icon
  • CAR
    113.
    Chazz Surratt
    LB North Carolina
     
  • CAR
    120.
    Khalil Herbert
    RB Virginia Tech
    trade icon
  • CAR
    159.
    Marvin Wilson
    DT Florida State
    trade icon
  • CAR
    193.
    Josh Imatorbhebhe
    WR Illinois
     
  • CAR
    197.
    Jimmy Morrissey
    OC Pittsburgh
    trade icon
  • CAR
    222.
    Israel Mukuamu
    S South Carolina
     
pfn-logo-results-420x50-black.png

FULL RESULTS

START NEW SIM

Edited by Little Goody Two Shoes
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

image.thumb.png.5fffb47fe4e0f7bb3b4e0db4a597b9d2.png

I think this might be the best mock i have done so far. Switched it up a little, laid off the o line focus since everyone is so confident in the Free agent signings (dont know why) but the main objective with the first 4 picks was to fix the most glaring weaknesses outside of QB last year in my opinion. Now they become a strength, holland is a saftey, nickel corner, and punt return and is damn good in all 3 which makes him worthy of that 2nd round pick. Ifeat is a corner with size that can cover which is why i went with him over other cbs, we have enough small CBs. The last 2 picks are good develop projects with talent. Look them up and you will see. But i would love if we did something similar to this, too damn excited. Also if already picked, you can easily replace sewell with slater and it would still be the same.

 

Edited by CPF4LIFE
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be a good draft CPF4IFE. I would really like to see us draft J. Holland or Richie Grant in the 2nd round (or 3rd if one of them is available). I also like R. Stevenson as a mid to late round option at RB. He's a bigger back that I think could find a role in this offense. I really would have liked to have seen more packages with Cmac and Mike Davis on the field at the same time. I think its a look that would give the Offense a lot of options. They might be able to have that with someone like Stevenson too.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I need to redo my sub then.  Didn't realize that
    • Here is how I see it. I haven't read through all the comments so it has probably been said. We had ONE way, just one single way to win that game against the Bills. With us having a QB who decided he wanted to switch teams real quick, the only chance (and yes, still a small chance) to win that game was run the ball, with one of top, most violent RB's in the league, down the throat of one of the worst defenses in the league. You start the first play and you keep doing it until the final whistle. Doing this keeps the ball out of the hands of our QB who forgot what he was supposed to be doing that day. It keeps the ball out of the hands of a solid offense you would have to stop. You run the ball with the guy who gets more yards, which in turn should net you more points (I think Dave forgot that getting more yards is better than less yards though, so I hope someone let him know this after the game). Running the ball also can eat up the clock if successful. So the only way we win is a slow, methodical low scoring game where we own the time of possession. What does Dave do? The exact opposite of all that. Dave honest the god, took the best gameplan you  could use, a gameplan any 10 year old that only watches every other game would know to use, that every single fan knows you had to use, Dave's gameplan was to do the exact opposite of that. Dave thought it is better to use a RB that would net you way less yards than the other. Someone will have to explain why it is better to 1/3 the yards you could get (explain why a 4 yard gain is better than a 12 yard gain.) I honestly dont know why less yards is better. It seems like some are saying guys are happier and have more fun the following Monday if they lose but someone is happier because they got to run more? That confuses me. Dave decided instead to put the ball in the hands of a QB who would forget which way they are going down the field, and that's the game has a timer, which ends when the timer goes to zero. Not only does Dave decide to play the players that do worse in practice and games, he will avoid the plays that would seem to have the most chance of success, he decides to keep to the plays that don't work. In orher words, if history shows the play would yield success, you dont use that play. If you have been using a play that does not work at all, that means you should not use any other play except the ones that dont work. Dave will have to explain that strategy also because I don't understand it.  And finally, those who actually watch the whole game can see it, Dave Canales shows an immense amount of fear. He was scared to death of the Bills. You can't get that from the box score. You also can't understand just how much his fear contributes to the loss. Thats why people who say it was all Dalton just don't have the mental capacity to judge, or did not watch at all (only looked at numbers). For example, I think it was the second drive (maybe forth). Dave stopped a touchdown, it was all him. Rico does what Rico does (made Dave look dumb by showing more yards are better than less) and busts out something like a 40 yard run. Things are rolling. Instead of keeping the drive rolling Dave said "hold up, less points are better than more points...i have to stop this." So he pulls out a play so dumb that it leaves the place in shock. He puts Dalton out wide where everyone knows he is worthless, making the decision that we are onlying using 10 players this play, and we don't feel like have a QB at the moment....the perfect time for wildcat (because we are cats too). Its executed exactly as Dave hoped for, flawlessly...a loss of yards. Booyah. Things looking good. Now it's time to put it in Dalton's hands to seal the deal. It goes off perfectly. Buffalo gets the ball. Dave proves he is a genius. I guess I was wrong about him...
×
×
  • Create New...