Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Verge's 2021 Mock Draft


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well, maybe this will help.

There were guys Tepper wanted for the GM job, including guys that nobody else was interviewing (seriously, Brandt Tillis?) and there were guys that Matt Rhule wanted for the GM job.

None of Tepper's guys even made it to the second round. Rhule won that debate.

I'd call that a reason for hope.

And here you were....almost talking me into hoping that Tepper had rounded a corner.

Man...black cat and all...we are snakebitten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Verge said:

Sewell > Horn > Waddle > Slater 
Is how I understand it 

People are talking about how deep CB is---and it is. 

How deep is CB1?   I count 2 or 3.  Full stop.  We need CB1 here, and Verge has stated it that way----accurately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

People are talking about how deep CB is---and it is. 

How deep is CB1?   I count 2 or 3.  Full stop.  We need CB1 here, and Verge has stated it that way----accurately.

CB1 is probably Horn, Surtain, Newsome, and Farley. That's it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Verge said:

We are also very high on Farley. Just a matter of where you take him with the injury.

He was my favorite coming in--guessing that he is the pick if we trade back with NE or WFT.  I don't really like Darrisaw as much the more I watch him, so I am hoping CB 1 in round 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

He was my favorite coming in--guessing that he is the pick if we trade back with NE or WFT.  I don't really like Darrisaw as much the more I watch him, so I am hoping CB 1 in round 1

I need to know how much weight Farley was pulling when f’d up his back 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, poster also said Young or Mahomes, it would have made no difference.  If there was way to actually test that hypothetical, I would sell every belonging I have and wager that Mahomes would indeed yield different results.  Mahomes automatically changes the D coverages.  He automatically changes the threats.  He attacks and threatens a field different vastly different.   We have seen good QBs and great QBs play behind horrific OLs in a single season....and they don't default into being the worst team in the NFL.  Frank Reich was old, stubborn and not creative enough to deal with an anomaly QB like Bryce.  The best QB in the NFL wouldn't be handicapping Frank, they would be enhancing Frank.  Starting week 1, Frank didn't even trust Bryce with basics....Frank gave him I what I feel comfortable with you being able to do offense.  Which took throws and plays off the table because Bryce couldn't do early on what a bad vet in Dalton could.  Mahomes would not yield the same results. 
    • All I have to say to this really, is it sounds nice and downgrades Stroud to make Young look better is more like what this take does. Look at the WR numbers the year before and then the year with Stroud. He made them better, not the other way around. That’s my opinion. I appreciate you designating that it was yours. Many state these things as facts.
    • but what if.....and here me out....the pro Bryce Young stuff was coming from people under Fitterer.  You know, the people who are employed to feed him that input.  And they happen to all still be employed here.  when Rhule was fired I desperately wanted Fitterer fired.  It set things up for Fitterer to be the sacrificial lamb the next time things went poorly....every time we move on from a disaster, we are retaining a heavy % of the folks who helped bring the disaster we are "moving on from".  Everyone argued Fitterer probably could be great and it was all Rhule.  We are just repeating the same stuff to a degree IMO.   Panthers needed a clean slate post Rhule era.  Needed another post Frank era.  Things were just too bad or too dysfunctional IMO to be salvaging so much.   We keep failing to do that. 
×
×
  • Create New...