Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots "talked" to Falcons about trading for #4 pick (Fields)


TheWiz
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

If they're talking about potentially jumping up that high I'm not liking our chances at #8.

Didn’t they also talk to us about #8? In all honestly, it makes me think that neither of us will get what we are hoping for. I want LT, I know you are in the QB camp. But I really think we might be considering CB with the first pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

Didn’t they also talk to us about #8? In all honestly, it makes me think that neither of us will get what we are hoping for. I want LT, I know you are in the QB camp. But I really think we might be considering CB with the first pick. 

I think they were thinking about us initially... but that trade with Denver told NE that we're seriously in the market to draft a QB if he falls to us. Sam, PJ, and Will dont strike us as a strong QB room. I think that Fields/ Lance are two guys that we like... but even Mac Jones could get drafted by us at 8 depending on how things fell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

There’s still a small part of me that thinks maybe the 49ers have been so hush about taking Fields because they didn’t want the Jets to second guess their decision. 

I actually completely agree with this. It makes sense. 

 

Or the 9ers really are that dumb and traded up for Mac Jones

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, TheWiz said:

I think they were thinking about us initially... but that trade with Denver told NE that we're seriously in the market to draft a QB if he falls to us. Sam, PJ, and Will dont strike us as a strong QB room. I think that Fields/ Lance are two guys that we like... but even Mac Jones could get drafted by us at 8 depending on how things fell.

I don’t think losing Teddy makes us look all that much weaker at QB. We may well take a QB or LT but my gut tells me Horn is our guy right now 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

There’s still a small part of me that thinks maybe the 49ers have been so hush about taking Fields because they didn’t want the Jets to second guess their decision. 

Been thinking it for a while. 9ers spread fud to throw Jets off Fields and “leak” that they’re taking Mac Jones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mr. 0-2 every year to start the season in his career. Last year was the first year he ever played a week 3 game. 
    • The good thing about replacing a bad player is you really have nothing to lose. If their replacement is bad so what, you didn't get much worse and probably saved money.  
    • I came over from the old Panthers Insider site. When Fox Sports bought that platform it slowly just started dying plus the guy who ran that site was dealing with some pretty significant health issues so the whole thing just slowly fell apart. Quite a few of us migrated over here. Not sure how many are still around.  I miss that place. It struck a nice balance of having enough active posters to keep productive conversation flowing but didn't have so much traffic that you end up with a lot of trolling BS. This place is getting there though since we shutdown new registrations but at some point we're going to have to open it back up or we'll watch this place slowly die off too as posters fall off for one reason or another. We just have to figure out a way to filter out the spam bots. It was a never ending battle to ban the spam bots to keep then from overrunning the site. You'd think they'd be a little more strategic. I mean, if you fill a site with nothing but spam people are just going to stop coming so it's not a sustainable model. But nope, every one of them makes dozens of duplicate threads filling up pages upon pages as soon as their account goes live.
×
×
  • Create New...