Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We are missing FS


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

In Snow's system the safety roles are swappable. There really isnt a SS or FS. He uses the Joker/Monster to replace the SS. That's what Chinn did last year.

Boston was a safety blanket, always deep.  That’s 100% pure free safety.  Boston got burnt constantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ja Rhule said:

Boston was a safety blanket, always deep.  That’s 100% pure free safety.  Boston got burnt constantly.

Why we let Boston go, kept Burris and acquired two new LBs in FA.  Trust me, Chinn will be playing more coverage roles this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 weird.. it deleted my response here.. Snow's defense is position agnnostic, and a hybrid cover 3. There isnt just one person who covers deep. Boston was in that role bc he was really bad in the box. You could probbaly think of  a few long runs where Tre blew it.

Snow likes to play mirror on the strongside and weakside of the field. This allows him to mix things up and cause confusion for opposing offenses. Unfortunately last year no one could cover a WR to execuite this.  Now things are looking quite different.

5 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

Boston was a safety blanket, always deep.  That’s 100% pure free safety.  Boston got burnt constantly.

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I didn't say I thought throwing it was a bad decision, I said I thought not running those 3-5 yard routes to pick up the 1st down wasn't a great call.  Yes the play worked out, but I didn't love the play call, it's like when a bad shooter is taking a 3 and you're yelling "no no no" as they're going up and then they make it so it worked out. That's still gambling on them to make the play and I take no issue with that. But I just went and watched the play again, we had T-Mac and XL running downfield crossing routes, Coker went in motion behind the LOS and then moved up a yard or two after the snap but not even past the LOS, Sanders chipped the DE and then ran a drag route right long the LOS. The play worked out, but I don't really like that particular play call and route tree with the game on the line on a 4th and 2.  If you want to send one route downfield as an option that's fine, but there were only 2 realistic target options with that route tree and they were both 15-20 yards downfield.
    • If BY comes back, they 100% need to bring in legit competition.    Heres what as you are alluding too. This team can either sign Icky&Mays or BY, I do not see both without cuts/trades/etc. My vote is for Icky&Mays, draft a QB....  
    • JB shouldn’t even be a thought IMO.  Bonus if he ever matters for us.  
×
×
  • Create New...