Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We have to go tackle in the second round, right?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Snake said:

I say you draft two or three IMO.

It will be a mistake to not end up with 2-3 OL in this draft.

I don't expect us to end up with 2-3 OL from this draft. I am honestly getting the feeling that this staff/FO may have a lower priority on OL than the previous coaching staff/GM.

I sincerely hope I am proven wrong over the next two days.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

It will be a mistake to not end up with 2-3 OL in this draft.

I don't expect us to end up with 2-3 OL from this draft. I am honestly getting the feeling that this staff/FO may have a lower priority on OL than the previous coaching staff/GM.

I sincerely hope I am proven wrong over the next two days.

Rhule has yet to draft a offensive player period.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snake said:

Rhule has yet to draft a offensive player period.

The FA OL signings also left a lot to be desired. I just get the feeling their mentality about OL is that you can throw together a unit from JAGS and make do. We are in year two of doing exactly that. 

But....still lots of draft left to prove me wrong.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

The FA OL signings also left a lot to be desired. I just get the feeling their mentality about OL is that you can throw together a unit from JAGS and make do. We are in year two of doing exactly that. 

But....still lots of draft left to prove me wrong.

Well if thats the case we will be picking top 10 again next year. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, woahfraze said:

We better not take Walker Little.  At least not before the later rounds.  Hasn't played football in 2 years and has injury concerns.  You can't spend a 2nd on a player with those risks.  It'd have to be a late round flyer.

And his last name is Little. I'm not drafting another Little in the 2nd round. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I agree 100% but holy hell I am just not understanding why we are not addressing the offensive line.  This is insanity.   Assuming we pick a safety

so far that's just how the drafts last year and this year have fallen. it's not like there's a giant conspiracy against the OL. If sewell had been there, we'd have taken him.

there are a few solid OL prospects on the board right now. it is likely that one of them will be BPA, or at least close enough that we will take one at 39, but who knows. if moehrig falls all the way to our spot, or if everyone in front of us goes OL, then we will be in a spot again where OL isn't our best pick.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

I really like teven and even if you think he projects as a RT that might be a good way to not have to pay Moton, slide teven into RT and that freed up money you can use in FA to address LT next year. We’ll see.

Or move Moton to the left.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

so far that's just how the drafts last year and this year have fallen. it's not like there's a giant conspiracy against the OL. If sewell had been there, we'd have taken him.

there are a few solid OL prospects on the board right now. it is likely that one of them will be BPA, or at least close enough that we will take one at 39, but who knows. if moehrig falls all the way to our spot, or if everyone in front of us goes OL, then we will be in a spot again where OL isn't our best pick.

Well we haven't exactly made good FA OL moves either. I think that makes me suspicious much more than the drafting.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that like to use their own eyes: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
    • For a LB that is a long career.  They take a beating.  Shoulders and head.  My favorite LB of All Time--Junior Seau--had a 20-year career--the average career for a STARTING MLB is 5.6 years.  I really think Shaq is done, but if he can play, it does not mean that he should.   Think about Morgan's career--7 seasons.  Luke's career--8 seasons.  Beason played only 93 games over 10 years--only 5 seasons where he played 15 games or more.  The other 5 seasons?  No more than 5 games per.  So basically, the average starting MLB plays 90 games in his career.  Shaq has played 123 games and was pretty injury free until the last 2 seasons (6 games total). 
×
×
  • Create New...