Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Bayless or Zylstra out?


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

Barring that we don’t trade Anderson or Moore. If we carry 6 WR the room will likely be:

1. Moore

2. Anderson

3. Moore

4. Marshall

5. Smith

6. Zylstra

OR

1. Moore

2. Anderson

3. Moore

4. Marshall

5. Smith

6. Bayless

Zylstra has size, experience and kills it on special teams.

Bayless was UDFA pick up last year who blew it up in college but missed the season with an injury.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it funny how people get blinders about players they like?.  Yea, Zylstra was great on ST.  So was Colin Jones.

Don't worry about ST.  It's overrated.  Pick your six best catchers of the ball, runners of routes.  We'll find somebody to run down the field on punts.

Edited by BrianS
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Isn't it funny how people get blinders about players they like?.  Yea, Zylstra was great on ST.  So was Colin Jones.

Don't worry about ST.  It's overrated.  Pick your six best catchers of the ball, runners of routes.  We'll find somebody to run down the field on punts.

If you're WR5 or 6 on the team, it helps to bring something extra to the table (e.g. special teams ace, kick returner) because chances are you won't see the field on passing downs. Better Zylstra actually contribute on special teams than Bayless sit on the bench all the game. Maybe Bayless would do well on ST, I don't know. But I do think that will factor in. You can always stash Bayless on the practice squad and put him on the roster if we have multiple injuries. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Isn't it funny how people get blinders about players they like?.  Yea, Zylstra was great on ST.  So was Colin Jones.

Don't worry about ST.  It's overrated.  Pick your six best catchers of the ball, runners of routes.  We'll find somebody to run down the field on punts.

Fair enough. That’s honestly still Zylstra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Isn't it funny how people get blinders about players they like?.  Yea, Zylstra was great on ST.  So was Colin Jones.

Don't worry about ST.  It's overrated.  Pick your six best catchers of the ball, runners of routes.  We'll find somebody to run down the field on punts.

I love a good-ole fashioned 6 WR set

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

Barring that we don’t trade Anderson or Moore. If we carry 6 WR the room will likely be:

1. Moore

2. Anderson

3. Moore

4. Marshall

5. Smith

6. Zylstra

OR

1. Moore

2. Anderson

3. Moore

4. Marshall

5. Smith

6. Bayless

Zylstra has size, experience and kills it on special teams.

Bayless was UDFA pick up last year who blew it up in college but missed the season with an injury.

 

Don’t count out Keith Kirkwood he has experience in Saints Joe Brady scheme 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...