Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers interviewing Morgan, others for Assistant GM job


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

If that's the case then I am very disappointed, no disgusted with this.  Race is not a qualifier for anything and if that's the reason Morgan gets the job the f*ck that.  And you too if that's the way you think.

The only thing that matters he or she is the best person that fits the vision for the job, period.

Based on his bio, I'd say Cunningham is legitimately qualified regardless of other factors.

Still think Morgan has the inside track though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dilla said:

I would prefer Poles as well. Familiarity is not always the way to go.

Poles isn't a candidate at this point. It's speculated that he will be, but he's not yet.

Either way though, it can be quite objectively said that Morgan has the best resumé of the bunch. Plenty of people believe he'll be a GM himself before too long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Remember when we were supposed to be looking for an Assistant GM that was going to work under Marty Hurney for a few years and be groomed by Marty to be his replacement?

Those were good times, huh?

Let's not repeat that stupid poo again please.  Not knocking Dan's abilities at all as I love the guy.  I just want the best candidate period and when someone throws out that Rooney Rule bs I get triggered.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Let's not repeat that stupid poo again please.  Not knocking Dan's abilities at all as I love the guy.  I just want the best candidate period and when someone throws out that Rooney Rule bs I get triggered.

Understood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Let's not repeat that stupid poo again please.  Not knocking Dan's abilities at all as I love the guy.  I just want the best candidate period and when someone throws out that Rooney Rule bs I get triggered.

Why not let Fitterer determine who he wants and assume he knows more about what he wants than people looking at a list of names and coming to arbitrary conclusions?

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO If judging by star scoring situation I'd give Dan Morgan a slight advantage because of familiarity with the team and GM. Morgan 4¹/² ⭐ and Cunningham 4 ⭐! So I'd be happy with either one as long as it stays at 2 candidates and not be between 13 candidates like it was with GM!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, razorwolf said:

IMO If judging by star scoring situation I'd give Dan Morgan a slight advantage because of familiarity with the team and GM. Morgan 4¹/² ⭐ and Cunningham 4 ⭐! So I'd be happy with either one as long as it stays at 2 candidates and not be between 13 candidates like it was with GM!

I hope they interview as many as they need to find the good fit.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Remeber when he actually posted here? A few clowns making fun of his concussions drove him away of course.

We always drive them away sooner or later on the huddle Greg Hardy was on here and knuckleheads ran him off too. 

Never know how much these guys would have shared if we were nice. Haters.

I hope Dan comes back, I didn't get to CheezMo's sp before it closed. People had great things to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Poles isn't a candidate at this point. It's speculated that he will be, but he's not yet.

Either way though, it can be quite objectively said that Morgan has the best resumé of the bunch. Plenty of people believe he'll be a GM himself before too long.

Maaaaaaaan! A former Panther as GM?!?

Blow Your Mind Wow GIF by Product Hunt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...