Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers interviewing Morgan, others for Assistant GM job


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

If that's the case then I am very disappointed, no disgusted with this.  Race is not a qualifier for anything and if that's the reason Morgan gets the job the f*ck that.  And you too if that's the way you think.

The only thing that matters he or she is the best person that fits the vision for the job, period.

Based on his bio, I'd say Cunningham is legitimately qualified regardless of other factors.

Still think Morgan has the inside track though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dilla said:

I would prefer Poles as well. Familiarity is not always the way to go.

Poles isn't a candidate at this point. It's speculated that he will be, but he's not yet.

Either way though, it can be quite objectively said that Morgan has the best resumé of the bunch. Plenty of people believe he'll be a GM himself before too long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Remember when we were supposed to be looking for an Assistant GM that was going to work under Marty Hurney for a few years and be groomed by Marty to be his replacement?

Those were good times, huh?

Let's not repeat that stupid poo again please.  Not knocking Dan's abilities at all as I love the guy.  I just want the best candidate period and when someone throws out that Rooney Rule bs I get triggered.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Let's not repeat that stupid poo again please.  Not knocking Dan's abilities at all as I love the guy.  I just want the best candidate period and when someone throws out that Rooney Rule bs I get triggered.

Understood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Let's not repeat that stupid poo again please.  Not knocking Dan's abilities at all as I love the guy.  I just want the best candidate period and when someone throws out that Rooney Rule bs I get triggered.

Why not let Fitterer determine who he wants and assume he knows more about what he wants than people looking at a list of names and coming to arbitrary conclusions?

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO If judging by star scoring situation I'd give Dan Morgan a slight advantage because of familiarity with the team and GM. Morgan 4¹/² ⭐ and Cunningham 4 ⭐! So I'd be happy with either one as long as it stays at 2 candidates and not be between 13 candidates like it was with GM!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, razorwolf said:

IMO If judging by star scoring situation I'd give Dan Morgan a slight advantage because of familiarity with the team and GM. Morgan 4¹/² ⭐ and Cunningham 4 ⭐! So I'd be happy with either one as long as it stays at 2 candidates and not be between 13 candidates like it was with GM!

I hope they interview as many as they need to find the good fit.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Remeber when he actually posted here? A few clowns making fun of his concussions drove him away of course.

We always drive them away sooner or later on the huddle Greg Hardy was on here and knuckleheads ran him off too. 

Never know how much these guys would have shared if we were nice. Haters.

I hope Dan comes back, I didn't get to CheezMo's sp before it closed. People had great things to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Poles isn't a candidate at this point. It's speculated that he will be, but he's not yet.

Either way though, it can be quite objectively said that Morgan has the best resumé of the bunch. Plenty of people believe he'll be a GM himself before too long.

Maaaaaaaan! A former Panther as GM?!?

Blow Your Mind Wow GIF by Product Hunt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • overall agree on the draft grade as a whole on on each pick, but every time I read (and I have read it more than once) that we "gave up two firsts" for Bryce, I am confused. We gave up the 2024 first, but we swapped 2023 firsts, so we didn't give up anything there. We did give up our former first rounder in DJ, but I don't think thats what you mean as one of the "firsts" we gave up.
    • Didn't  see this posted (since 2023) but since folks have been posting that you can't judge a draft class for three years (a ridiculous take), I thought I'd post this to see what people thought about the 2023 draft. Unfortunately this may not be the most interesting class to do this with but I do quite like retrospective draft grades. Would appreciate other's takes on this (and other recent) draft classes.   1(1) - Bryce Young QB: I am a bigger Bryce Young apologist than most (maybe all). I like the kid. But there is no way around it: This was a terrible pick. If he had been picked in the 4th or even the 3rd round I would feel pretty good about it. But this was the first overall pick that we gave up two firsts, our best offensive player to get.  GRADE: C -    2(39) - Jonathan Mingo WR: not much to say here here. He was here for two years. His yards per catch are on par with Bryce's yards per pass. Rough stuff. To date he has still never scored a touchdown in the NFL GRADE: F   3(80) - DJ Johnson OLB: a pick I hated as soon as it happened and an example of why the premise of this thread is honestly dumb. This was a bad pick when it happened. Most people knew it.  Then came training camp and he did not look good. Then came the preseason which confirmed what we saw in TC. Then came the season which confirmed what we saw in preseason. To date, he has half a sack in his career. GRADE: F 4 (114) Chandlers Zavala G: Honestly the best pick of this draft which really speaks to how awful this draft is. Other than Bryce, the only pick still on the team. He is mostly average or below average depth which in round 4 is not terrible. But he had a pff score of 43.5 and though I think people have unrealistic expectations for draft picks, I still would want a little more from a fourth round pick GRADE: C+   5 (145) - Jammie Robinson S: I liked the pick when it happened but ended up being a disappointment. He logged 1 tackle with the falcons last year and not enough snaps to get a grade on PFF.  GRADE: F OVERALL DRAFT GRADE: F  
    • You gonna make me post Stank before every game?  I kid, I kid. 
×
×
  • Create New...