Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Robby Anderson being shopped?


Recommended Posts

Riddle me this: if, on dat 1 of the draft, an AFC team offered a 4th & 2022 2nd for Robbie, would you be mad at that trade?

 

and if Fitt turned it down?

 

i like Robbie, especially with DJ & CMC & Co, the whole is greater than & all that, just asking…..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

 

Please elaborate further...

...what are the specifics?

 

8 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Disney world for his daughters birthday according to his IG account 

How dare he!   Right, Sizzle? 😏

 

Anyway, OTA's are voluntary so I don't see anything worth concerning about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, j2sgam said:

Riddle me this: if, on dat 1 of the draft, an AFC team offered a 4th & 2022 2nd for Robbie, would you be mad at that trade?

 

and if Fitt turned it down?

 

i like Robbie, especially with DJ & CMC & Co, the whole is greater than & all that, just asking…..

A 2nd and 4th for Robbie?

I’d have Sir Purr and Tepper go pack up his house for him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, glenwo2 said:

 

How dare he!   Right, Sizzle? 😏

 

Anyway, OTA's are voluntary so I don't see anything worth concerning about.

he can do whatever he wants. 

but he is on 1 year deal.  We just brought in a brand new QB and still have a new coaching staff and O here on top of that. 

It’s voluntary.  It’s not the end of the world.  But that is not what you want to see given the circumstances.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

people are acting like just because they played together in NY that either of them liked each other or brought out the best of each other. Anderson can't catch the fastball. It's why he worked with Bridgewater. Look at his catch percentages for every other year besides last year and you'll see why there's a VERY reasonable expectation that he's going to take a step back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Vagrant said:

people are acting like just because they played together in NY that either of them liked each other or brought out the best of each other. Anderson can't catch the fastball. It's why he worked with Bridgewater. Look at his catch percentages for every other year besides last year and you'll see why there's a VERY reasonable expectation that he's going to take a step back. 

Sam doesn't exactly throw Bullets either, though.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stbugs said:

100%. We aren’t a SB contender this year and Robbie is likely gone so outside of Sam having a security blanket, that would have been an instant yes. A lot more than we ever would have gotten in a comp pick and it might have gotten canceled anyway.

I'd love to extend Anderson but I'm not expecting it.

Very possible the Marshall pick was to backfill for that eventuality.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/27/2021 at 8:29 AM, CRA said:

It might not be because he dislikes Sam specifically but the scenario he finds himself in. 

It could just be he is in the last year of his contract coming off a breakout season.  It's a business.  It's not an ideal spot to go into this season like that.   Players want some security when they think they deserve it.  

Imagine if Robbie broke his leg week 2?  It's a perfectly reasonable stance that Robbie's team could of already been in serious talks with the new GM about Robbie's situation.  In fact, I would think that is likely a certainty.  

I think Robbie was not happy with Sam’s inability to get the ball in his hands as he thought he should while with the Jets.  Justified.   Imagine his frustration, the nfl is a business, and getting balls over, or under thrown or uncatchable is costing you money.

Often that doesn’t allow you to see that your QB is frustrated as well, because he has no outlet (run game), crappy line, few dependable weapons, and coaching that handcuffs you from doing what you’re best at.  Frustration, rather internal or vocal, leads to poor decisions.  I feel for Robby, likely thinking “oh sh*t, here we go again”. As you say down here, hope “y’all” give it some time to work out.

Edited by 1usctrojan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd rather have him and his familiarity with Darnold this year, then take the likely 3rd round comp pick.

I mean, I would listen to your sales pitch.  I probably shut the door on you if we still had Samuel though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I mean, I would listen to your sales pitch.  I probably shut the door on you if we still had Samuel though.  

Yeah, me too. I just think Robby will be valuable this year and give Darnold his best chance of recovering from his likely shellshocked state. We've hitched out wagon to Darnold. Give him his best chance, because honestly if he flops I think Rhule's seat is going to start warming up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Robbie likes Teddy better (They're both S. Florida Boys) based on the interviews, but I'm not sure he actually has concerns about Darnold. Like Sam's, Robbie's production was partially limited by Gase's offense. He seemed to be tasked with a very limited route tree based on what I've seen in NY. I remember there was a lot of talk about how he was able to be a bigger part of the offense (running a more expanded route tree I bet) here in Carolina. The way Brady used him he was able to shed the reputation he had has a "one trick pony".

I would like to see him run some of those comebacks, outs and digs like he did in NY on the sideline- He and Sam seemed to be able to connect on those and they were impossible to defend. Its the type of play that would come in handy at the end of games to stop the clock and keep the chains moving.

 

Edited by Michael G
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...